The scoop on supplements for disease prevention

Approximately 40% of Canadians regularly consume vitamin and mineral supplements, hoping to prevent disease, promote longevity, or compensate for the inadequacies of the typical Canadian diet. Epidemiologic studies suggest that diets high in nutrient-rich foods like fruits, vegetables, and fish are effective in preventing disease.[1] The traditional assumption is that simply replacing these nutrients with supplements will provide the same benefit. Unfortunately, although supplementation may change serum levels, total intake, or other surrogate markers, well-designed controlled studies on artificial supplementation have failed to show consistent reduction in fractures, heart disease, cancer, or dementia.[2,3,4,5,6] The synergy of nutrients and related substances (e.g., phytochemicals, antioxidants, fibre) available in foods has yet to be replicated by a pill.

There are certain situations where supplementation should be considered:

  • Folic acid to prevent congenital neural tube defects (strong evidence).[1]
  • Vitamin D in breastfed infants (strong evidence), frail elderly women (moderate evidence), and dark-skinned or homebound patients (low evidence).[7]
  • Iron for those with low intake (vegetarians), regular blood loss (e.g., menorrhagia), or at risk for poor absorption (elderly on medications such as metformin, proton pump inhibitors).[1]
  • Vitamin B12 for vegans and those at risk for poor absorption.[1]

For other supplements, including calcium, antioxidants, B vitamins, vitamin C, omega-3s, co-enzyme Q10, and zinc, there is no evidence of benefit for disease prevention[2,3,4,5,6] and no indication for routine screening for deficiencies.

Although taking a daily multivitamin is considered safe, it is unnecessary for most Canadians. Some experts suggest that food-insecure Canadians or those with a very poor diet may benefit; however, this has not been proven. Many foods in Canada are already enriched to prevent widespread deficiencies.[2,3]

Contrary to the widely held belief that vitamins and minerals are natural and therefore safe, supplements can be harmful, particularly if exceeding tolerable upper levels, but also in recommended doses. Recent studies have shown increased risk of myocardial infarction with beta-carotene, calcium, and vitamin E; increased all-cause mortality from vitamin E and beta-carotene; teratogenesis from vitamin A at high doses; and nephrolithiasis from zinc, vitamin C, and calcium.[1]

Minerals like calcium or iron can impair absorption of levothyroxine, bisphosphonates, and fluoroquinolones, and vitamin B6 reduces absorption of medications like levodopa and antiepileptics. Vitamin A and beta-carotene can increase hepatotoxicity of medications including acetaminophen, carbamazepine, methotrexate, warfarin, and retinoids. Vitamin E can potentiate the bleeding risk of warfarin, ASA, and NSAIDs.[1] The cost of supplements can be significant.

Studies have repeatedly found examples of supplements containing contaminants, dangerous additives, and misleading or inaccurate labeling or dosage information.[8] Unfortunately, the supplement industry has resisted stricter regulation to ensure consumer safety.[8]

Despite the consistent lack of evidence of benefit, many patients continue to take supplements. The following recommendations can help patients minimize potential harms:

  • Do not exceed recommended doses.
  • Discuss supplements with health care providers.
  • Purchase well-known brands labeled with Health Canada natural product numbers.

As trusted sources of up-to-date, evidence-based information, physicians need to help patients interpret the overwhelming volume of often poor quality information available by providing clear guidance. Required nutrients are best obtained through a healthy diet rich in whole foods. We can’t replace a poor diet with a pill. “Let food be your medicine, and medicine be your food.” —Hippocrates
—Ilona Hale, MD
—Kathleen Cadenhead, MD
—Mary Hinchliffe, MD


This article is the opinion of the Council on Health Promotion and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    McCord P, Opsteen J. Vitamin and mineral supplementation: Primary disease prevention. Foundation for Medical Practice Education 2016;24(6).

2.    Singal M, Banh HL, Allan GM. Daily multivitamins to reduce mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:847.

3.    Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Pase MP. Multivitamin-multimineral supplementation and mortality: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:437-444.

4.    Fortmann SP, Burda BU, Senger CA, et al. Vitamin and mineral supplements in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: An updated systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:824-834.

5.    Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Buijsse B, et al. Dietary supplements and risk of cause-specific death, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of primary prevention trials. Syst Rev 2015;4:34.

6.    Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, Ioannidis JP. Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ 2014;348:g2035.

7.    Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(1):CD007470.

8.    Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, et al. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med 2013;11:222.

Ilona Hale, MD, FCFPC, Kathleen Cadenhead, MD, Mary Hinchliffe, MD. The scoop on supplements for disease prevention. BCMJ, Vol. 58, No. 9, November, 2016, Page(s) 502-503 - Council on Health Promotion.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply