Re: Are vitamins a complete waste of money?
In her January/February editorial, Dr Caitlin Dunne points out that there is no good evidence for adding vitamins or supplements to most people’s diet [BCMJ 2023;65:4]. People are misled to believe there is a benefit and fall victim to the relentless power of advertising.
I would like to add a suggestion that we encourage adequate intake of omega-3 fatty acids from healthy food and not from proprietary products. Most of us already have good intake of omega-3 fatty acids from fish, oils, nuts, and vegetables, and we could suggest redirecting the high cost of these supplements to pay for wild fish and organic vegetables available from local providers across BC to those who do not eat enough of these foods.
The vitamin and supplement industry, in my opinion, is an unnecessary and highly successful scam that wastes the precious income of too many people. People would be healthier with a better unsupplemented diet.
Finally, pelagic krill should be left in the ocean for natural predators, who deliver all the benefits to us when we eat wild fish. There is a risk of overfishing krill in Antarctica, which could further advance the demise of wild fish stocks. Humanity should do better than to cause that completely unnecessary loss.
—Rick Potter-Cogan, MB BCh BAO
This letter was submitted in response to “Are vitamins a complete waste of money?”
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.|
Rick Potter-Cogan, MB BCh BAO. Re: Are vitamins a complete waste of money?. BCMJ, Vol. 65, No. 3, April, 2023, Page(s) 78 - Letters.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org