Word choice and usage can have a powerful impact on someone’s thoughts and perception of their situation, particularly in clinical settings. Given this effect, WorkSafeBC has shifted to abilities-focused language when we discuss recovery, return to work, and return to function, both orally and in writing. This language is meant to help injured workers identify possibilities at home and at work and to be seen for what they can do, not what they can’t. Employers, in turn, have a much easier time finding a place for an injured employee when provided with a list of functional tasks the worker can perform.
Recently, we adjusted the language on many of the report templates used to document injured workers’ progress. These reports are completed by contracted treatment providers who deliver programs and services such as physiotherapy, mental health treatment, and occupational rehabilitation. Ideally, the worker’s attending physician is copied on such reports, which now use this abilities-focused language, meaning words with negative connotations have been replaced with more neutral terms. For example, limitations and barriers are now considerations and factors, respectively. This allows contracted treatment providers to speak to injured workers’ functional abilities and to facilitators that would support a safe and timely return to appropriate work duties.
When treatment reports are written through a lens of inability, exclusively identifying return-to-work barriers and limitations, they can foster a belief that return to work may not be possible.[1,2] Reports that speak to supportive interventions and the worker’s functional abilities foster a belief that recovery and return to work will occur. This information equips all clinicians, including attending physicians, with a better understanding of what the worker can do. Attending physicians can then readily encourage a return to safe and appropriate work duties and have more meaningful conversations with the injured worker about their recovery.
Focusing on an injured worker’s abilities doesn’t mean that injuries aren’t recognized or symptoms aren’t validated. It simply allows injured workers to see possibility where before they may have only seen inability. Given the well-known negative health effects of prolonged inactivity and being out of work, reframing recovery in a positive light supports an earlier return to preinjury function, helping mitigate these negative effects. To support this initiative, we’ve held workshops with contracted treatment providers throughout BC about the importance of and reason for this change.
Each practitioner involved in a worker’s care postinjury has a shared responsibility to do everything possible to support a return to preinjury function in a timely manner. Recent legislative changes will soon add a legal duty and obligation for employers to cooperate in the worker’s safe and timely return to work and to ensure that it occurs whenever possible. Word choice can, at first glance, seem inconsequential, but research has shown us otherwise. Together, let’s be mindful of using positive language when engaging with injured workers in the recovery and return-to-work process.
For more information
To learn more about the programs and services we offer to injured workers, visit www.worksafebc.com/en/health-care-providers/rehabilitation. If you’d like to speak with a WorkSafeBC medical advisor about your patients who are injured workers or if you have questions about being copied on treatment reports, call the RACE line at 604 696-2131 or toll-free at 1 877 696-2131.
Partners in Care webinar
Shifting to abilities-focused language is just one way we’re striving to support injured workers and their clinicians. Learn about WorkSafeBC supports and resources at our Partners in Care webinar on 21 September 2023. Register at https://ubccpd.ca.
—Karen Takai, MSc
Program Manager, Health Care Programs, WorkSafeBC
This article is the opinion of WorkSafeBC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.|
3. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London, UK: The Stationery Office, 2006. Accessed 20 July 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214326/hwwb-is-work-good-for-you.pdf.
4. Canadian Medical Association. The treating physician’s role in helping patients return to work after an illness or injury (update 2013). CMA PolicyBase. Last reviewed 29 February 2020. Accessed 20 July 2023. https://policybase.cma.ca/link/policy10754.
5. Government of BC. Return-to-work requirements will protect injured workers. 9 June 2023. Accessed 21 July 2023. https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2023LBR0025-000884.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org