Real-Time Virtual Support quick-reply pathways

Background

Residents of rural, remote, and Indigenous communities in British Columbia face significant disparities in accessing quality health care services and professional supports. These well-documented disparities are particularly pronounced in Indigenous communities, where a history of inequitable and underprioritized access to health care resources has been observed.[1] In response to these challenges, the Real-Time Virtual Support (RTVS) program launched its quick-reply pathways starting in 2020 (during the pandemic) to provide a pan-provincial roster of specialist services.[2,3] The quick-reply pathways provide timely, video-enabled access to specialty expertise for health care providers, such as on-the-ground family physicians working on the front lines of rural, remote, and Indigenous communities. 

RTVS quick-reply pathways are part of a larger network of rural video-enabled clinical supports, which also include emergency medicine (RUDi), maternity (MaBAL), and pediatric (CHARLiE) expertise. All providers strive to create a psychologically safe and supportive culture for clinicians to seek advice and exchange ideas. The “call a friend” culture of RTVS has made it easier for rural providers to reach out and advocate for patients who may need specialist care. Lowering barriers to access specialist support through the RTVS network can have significant positive influences on patient care and professional support. 

Sample case

Here we explore a case that highlights the impact quick-reply pathways can have for patients and providers in rural, remote, and Indigenous communities.

A 66-year-old male presented to the emergency room in Fort Nelson, which is 800 km from the nearest tertiary care hospital. The patient told his family physician that he had been experiencing headaches, confusion, general unwellness, and a rash for 3 months.  

Upon examination, the patient had a red, scaly, pruritic rash over his torso and limbs. There were no focal neurological deficits observed. Pertinent investigations revealed positive SSA and SSB antibodies, hypocomplementemia, a decline in hemoglobin levels from 120 to 80 over 5 months, and an increase in creatinine levels from 69 to 110 over the past year, along with hematuria and proteinuria. At a previous visit, a skin biopsy had been performed, revealing vacuolar interface dermatitis consistent with a connective tissue disease–associated rash. As well, 1 month prior, the patient had been hospitalized at a different facility for cognitive decline so severe he couldn’t speak or eat. During that admission, he was found to have diffuse symmetric white matter lesions involving the temporal lobes and sparing the corpus callosum on MRI. He improved with three doses of 1000 mg IV methylprednisolone but left hospital before further therapeutics could be initiated.

At this point, there was concern that the patient had neuropsychiatric lupus. Due to the complexity of the patient’s case, his family physician sought assistance from RTVS quick-reply specialists. Over several days, guided by his family physician, the patient interacted with the RTVS dermatologist, rheumatologist, hematologist, and neurologist. After ruling out alternative autoimmune, infectious, and malignant diagnoses, a diagnosis of neuropsychiatric lupus was confirmed. The patient is now receiving definitive care and is on the path to recovery. He is free of headaches with no neurocognitive symptoms, but he does not recall the events of the previous 3 months.

For rural physicians, encountering patients with rare, multisystem diseases can be challenging, and the lack of support managing these patients can be frustrating. The virtual physicians on the other end of the Zoom or telephone call are committed to be friendly, culturally safe, compassionate, and dedicated to providing assistance wherever needed. According to this patient’s family physician: “The help I received undoubtedly saved the patient from imminent decline. It was timely and effective. It was a real mountain of support for me, and in turn for the patient.”

Conclusions

Access to specialists should not require years-long waits and marathon journeys on the part of rural patients. Specialists are distributed inequitably in British Columbia and tend to work in urban centres. It is incumbent upon us as physicians to devise innovative programs to address the gaps in care that arise from this uneven distribution of specialists. The RTVS program aspires to provide quality care to rural areas that have been historically underserviced. Because of RTVS, rural clinicians no longer need to feel isolated, managing challenging medical conditions they have never seen. As this case demonstrates, advice is only a Zoom call away.

Additional information

RTVS quick-reply pathways are supported by the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia (RCCbc) and receive approximately 153 calls per month. Family physician compensation for accessing the pathways varies depending on the physician’s payment model. Specialists bill specialist advice codes or telehealth consultation codes for their interactions, depending on the nature of the encounter. 

How to get involved

Rural family physicians can access the RTVS quick-reply pathways through the directory of their RCCbc Zoom account. Specialists interested in becoming involved can contact the corresponding author, Dr Ohata, at brent.ohata@ubc.ca.

To find out more and connect with RTVS, visit https://rccbc.ca/initiatives/rtvs/getting-started.

Competing interests

Drs Ohata, Yee, Kitson, Johnston, and Pawlovich, and Ms Connop Price all hold positions with the RTVS program.

hidden


This article has been peer reviewed.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

1.    Greenwood M, de Leeuw S, Lindsay N. Challenges in health equity for Indigenous Peoples in Canada. Lancet 2018;391(10131):1645-1648.

2.    Novak Lauscher H, Stewart K, Markham R, et al. Real-Time Virtual Supports improving health equity and access in British Columbia. Healthc Manage Forum 2023;36:285-292.

3.    Government of British Columbia. Rural practice subsidiary agreement. 2022. Updated 11 March 2024. Accessed 21 April 2024. www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/practitioner-professional-resources/physician-compensation/rural-practice-programs/rural-practice-subsidiary-agreement

hidden


Dr Ohata is a clinical assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology at the University of British Columbia. Ms Connop Price is a communications officer, Real-Time Virtual Support, for the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia. Dr Yee is a clinical associate professor in the Division of Hematology at UBC and director of curriculum, undergraduate medical education, at UBC. Dr Lupu is a family physician in Fort Nelson, BC. Dr Kitson is an associate professor in the Division of Dermatology at UBC. Dr Johnston is a clinical associate professor and associate head of the Division of Neurology at UBC. Dr Pawlovich is a clinical associate professor in the Department of Family Practice at UBC, the UBC chair in rural health, medical director for Carrier Sekani Family Services, and virtual health lead for the Rural Coordination Centre of BC.

B.R. Ohata, MD, CM, R. Connop Price, A. Yee, MD, I. Lupu, MD, N.A. Kitson, MD, PhD, D. Johnston, MD, J. Pawlovich, MD. Real-Time Virtual Support quick-reply pathways. BCMJ, Vol. 66, No. 6, July, August, 2024, Page(s) 196-197 - Premise.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply