I wonder which committee thought that one up

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 66, No. 8, October 2024, Page 278 Editorials

Our hospital’s physician wellness committee is constantly looking for ways to promote and improve the wellness of our physician group. One of our recent projects was to resurrect the tradition of recognizing physicians for their contributions to health care in our community and their lengths of service (a good number of our physicians have given 30 to 37 years; I’ve been there for 31).

Many years ago, our hospital used to honor hospital staff (including nurses and physicians) for their length of service. Somehow, over the years, the practice continued for all hospital staff except physicians.

Our project culminated in an awards dinner—a big thank you to our colleagues who organized this—which was open to all physicians associated with the hospital and their partners, and it promised to be a fun evening. In a previous editorial, I referenced the practice of gratitude as a way to avoid burnout.[1] This was an opportunity for us to experience the gratitude bestowed upon us by others. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the turnout of physicians was lower than expected, but the people who usually attend hospital functions were there.

The OGs who were present had a fun time reminiscing about days gone by. We recalled a time when we could admit patients directly from our clinics, without having to send them to the emergency department. Those were the days when our hospital had beds and staff available.

FIGURE 1. Pinard horn. Source: This image is made available under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed licence, via Wikimedia Commons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinard_horn#/ media/File:Pinardhorn.jpg.All the reminiscing got me thinking back to my medical school days when we used equipment that is now relegated to the history books. Auscultating the fetal heart was done with a Pinard horn [Figure 1], which worked like an ear trumpet to amplify the sound of the fetal heartbeat. We checked hemoglobin at the bedside with a hemoglobinometer [Figure 2]. We had to takes erythrocyte sedimentation rates and cell counts manually. In those days, the latest drug to treat stomach ulcers was cimetidine, and it was so expensive that only the top consultants could order it.

FIGURE 2. American Optical Company hemoglobinometer. Source: This image is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Deed public domain dedication, via Wikimedia Commons. https://commons. wikimedia.org/wiki/File:American_Optical_Company_But I digress. The awards dinner was supported by the medical staff association and the Fraser Health Authority, which provided plaques and lapel pins for physicians being recognized. Physicians were called up in ascending order of their years of service, in 5-year blocks. When the presenter got to those who had served the hospital for 25 years, she included all who had served our community for 25 years and beyond. Apparently they made plaques recognizing up to 25 years of service and pins recognizing up to 20 years of service. How difficult could it have been to do it more precisely?

I am still struggling to understand this, considering a good number of our physicians have given substantially more years of service. Perhaps it was because the health authority was formed in 2001, or perhaps they’ve lost track of how many years each of us has served. All they had to do was ask. Instead, it felt as if they were saying “Thank you, Dr Chapman, for 25 years of service. Your additional 6 years of service don’t really matter.” I wonder which committee thought that one up.
—David B. Chapman, MBChB

hidden


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

1.    Chapman DB. Grateful. BCMJ 2024;66:37.

David B. Chapman, MBChB. I wonder which committee thought that one up. BCMJ, Vol. 66, No. 8, October, 2024, Page(s) 278 - Editorials.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply