Re: Restrictions on private health insurance

I am disappointed that the BCMJ allows Dr Brian Day (who is on the Editorial Board) to use the journal to advance the issues of his own ongoing litigation [2021;63:197]. This is not the first time he has been allowed to do this, and it is a potential conflict of interest.

I am surprised that the BCMJ would permit Dr Day to mention that Justice Steeves received care at government expense at the False Creek Surgical Centre: this is totally inappropriate and a serious breach of Justice Steeves’ personal information. It is not at all clear how this disclosure advances what Dr Day is proposing in his editorial. I suggest that the BCMJ follow up with Justice Steeves about this disclosure.
—Liz Keay, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, PhD

Editorial Board members are free to compose editorials on topics of their choice. The content of each editorial reflects the opinions of the author.

Dr Day has disclosed his potential conflict of interest in his bio on our website.[1] Regarding Justice Steeves’ personal information, he himself disclosed at the beginning of the trial that he had surgery (government funded) at Cambie. This was not so, and on being informed of his error, he stated he had erred, and clarified that it was at the False Creek Surgical Centre. This information has been in the public domain since 2016.[2]

The point of Dr Day’s statement is to underline the fact that the BC government considers it has the right to send patients who are waiting for surgery to private clinics, but denies citizens that same right. —ED

This letter was submitted in response to “Restrictions on private health insurance.”


1.    Editorial Board. BCMJ. Accessed 4 August 2021.

2.    Fayerman P. BC government lawyer says judge disclosed all details of his private clinic surgery. Vancouver Sun. 16 May 2017. Accessed 4 August 2021.

Liz Keay, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, PhD. Re: Restrictions on private health insurance. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 7, September, 2021, Page(s) 271-272 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Christopher Krause says: reply

This reply from the editor came off as quite defensive and glib. It did not address the perceived impropriety of Dr. Day using his editorial position to repeatedly prosecute his personal grievances about how his court case is going. Although he may have autonomy to write about what he wishes, if he can't think of anything else to write about, maybe he could donate his podium to someone who has something more interesting and appropriate to say?

Leave a Reply