Re: How can we improve competence in conducting pelvic exams?

Drs Steidle and Lostchuck are correct in surmising that there is a reluctance on the part of doctors to perform pelvic examinations [BCMJ 2023;65:329-330]. My experience suggests it is nothing new.

While practising family medicine in the North of BC in the late 1960s and early 1970s, I was asked to explain why my practice profile registered three standard deviations above “normal” for pelvic exam billings. Investigating the matter, it was found that our nurse instituted a call-in system for Pap smears at the recommended interval for the time. The conclusion to be drawn is that “normal” meant that the need for Pap smears (and thus pelvic exams) was being neglected, perhaps reflecting such reluctance.

The authors also noted a reluctance of supervisors during their medical students’ training to permit them to perform pelvic exams. My medical school gynecological training featured an introduction to the pelvic exam. Four volunteers, suitably screened, permitted us trainees to perform pelvic examinations on them to become familiar with pelvic anatomy. It seems this helpful practice has been discontinued.

I suspect the reluctance toward pelvic exams extends to rectal exams. My student training included a pathology department presentation of the medical case of an obscure anemia, the patient having succumbed to this disease. The morgue pathologist was able to demonstrate that a large rectal carcinoma was the cause of the anemia. None of the many examining physicians had performed a rectal exam.
—Anthony Walter, MD

This letter was submitted in response to “How can we improve competence in conducting pelvic exams?”


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Anthony Walter, MD. Re: How can we improve competence in conducting pelvic exams?. BCMJ, Vol. 66, No. 1, January, February, 2024, Page(s) 7-8 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply