Residential Care Initiative: Early data show impact and successes

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 59, No. 10, December 2017, Pages 525,528 Family Practice Services Committee

The GPSC’s Residential Care Initiative (RCI) was launched in 2014, with the goal of improving care for one of BC’s most vulnerable populations—seniors living in care facilities.


The GPSC’s Residential Care Initiative (RCI) was launched in 2014, with the goal of improving care for one of BC’s most vulnerable populations—seniors living in care facilities.[1] All divisions of family practice are working on RCI projects, meaning that 97% of the eligible 30 000 residential care beds in the province are now covered by projects funded by the initiative. Data from divisions and health authorities show that these projects are already making a significant impact on health outcomes and access to care.

Achieving system-level outcomes
RCI funding enables divisions to design local solutions for attaching residential care patients to a most responsible physician, ensuring comprehensive care throughout each patient’s life cycle and therefore improving quality of care for the frail elderly. 

To assist divisions in developing these solutions, the GPSC created five best-practice expectations and three system-level outcomes (Table) as benchmark goals for the initiative. 

RCI evaluation data show that many division projects are now meeting some or all of the five best-practice expectations, and moving toward fulfilling the RCI’s three system-level outcomes. 

Reduced unnecessary or inappropriate hospital transfers
To meet this outcome, doctors are improving access to regular medical care at facilities, evaluating more problems on-site, and ensuring that medications are reviewed regularly and end-of-life plans are clearly documented.

Doctors in Nelson have been providing regular medication reviews and regularly scheduled visits to facilities to ensure continuity of care. This work, coordinated by the Kootenay Boundary Division, has contributed to a hospital transfer rate in Nelson that is now five times lower than the Interior Health regional average. Doctors from the Fraser Northwest Division have implemented a 24/7 call system and worked to double the number of GPs providing proactive visits to residential care patients. These efforts have contributed to reducing emergency transfers by 5%, acute care admissions by 9%, and length of ER stays by 19%. 

Meaningful medication reviews in Mission have resulted in an 18% reduction in the number of patients on nine or more medications, and an 11% reduction in the use of antipsychotic medications. These improvements to patient care have contributed to a 33% reduction in ER transfers. 

Improved patient and provider experiences
Recognizing that care facilities are usually the last home for residents, doctors are committed to ensuring that these vulnerable patients can live and die with dignity. Providing residential care patients with access to regular, consistent care from a GP is an important component in improving their quality of life and overall health outcomes. Improving physician coverage also ensures that doctors feel supported and enables them to take the time to provide complex care when needed.

Fraser Northwest Division has reached the goal of ensuring that every residential care bed in the region is attached to a GP. Vancouver Division is working toward that goal by increasing the number of residential care GPs by almost 50%, and developing a succession planning strategy that helps newly graduated GPs take on residential care patients from retiring GPs.  

Reduced costs per patient with higher quality of care
Doctors and staff at residential care facilities are lowering system costs through efforts to reduce unnecessary or harmful medications, reduce unnecessary transfers to acute hospitals, and increase on-site care by GPs who know the patient (preventing duplication in the use of specialist, lab, and investigative resources).

Doctors in Victoria are organizing meaningful medication reviews that are scheduled to ensure that both a physician and a pharmacist can attend, and Fraser Northwest and Mission doctors are also working on division-organized projects to reduce unnecessary prescriptions through medication reviews. 

Fraser Northwest, Victoria, and Vancouver divisions have implemented after-hours call systems through which patients can access 24/7 care from a physician. Facility staff can connect with a doctor after hours in as little as 3 to 5 minutes in some cases.

South Okanagan Similkameen Division studied medication wastage at local care facilities, creating a report that recommends testing policy changes to address wastage issues. Recommendations include changing the default for medication orders from “STAT” to “next pouch day,” and creating a provincial working group to assist with standardizing medication order sheets and ensuring that successful practices from individual health authorities become generalized. Solving the medication wastage issues detailed in the report could save the province $550 000 per year.

More results to come
These early results highlight only a small sample of the RCI work being done by divisions of family practice. As more results become available through the evaluation process, a clearer picture will emerge of the ways in which access to care for residential care home patients is being improved consistently in communities around the province. 

For more information on any of the data or projects outlined in this article please e-mail residentialcare@doctorsofbc.ca.
—Brian Winsby, MD
—Darcy Eyres
Co-leads, Residential Care Initiative

hidden


This article is the opinion of the GPSC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


References

1. Winsby B, Eyres D. GPs innovating local strategies to improve residential care across BC. BCMJ 2015;8:358-359.

Brian Winsby, MD, Darcy Eyres. Residential Care Initiative: Early data show impact and successes. BCMJ, Vol. 59, No. 10, December, 2017, Page(s) 525,528 - Family Practice Services Committee.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply