Guest editorial: Breathing new life into old thinking

Portrait picture of Dr Robert D. Levy                      Portrait picture of Dr Don D. Sin

 

 

 

 

 

 

Until just a few short years ago, chronic obstructive pul­monary disease (COPD) was considered an untreatable respiratory condition resulting in breathlessness and impaired func­tional capacity. The only treatment options generally available and regularly promoted included short-acting bronchodilators for relief of dyspnea, and—for hypoxemic patients with a view to mitigating cor pulmonale and hopefully improving survival—supplemental domiciliary oxygen. 

Much attention was paid to the clinical distinction between chronic bronchitis (a clinical condition) and emphysema (a morphologic abnorm­al­ity), although the therapeutic implications of this distinction remained somewhat elusive. Similarly, medical trainees were coached in the subtle physiologic relevance of separating the “blue bloaters” from the “pink puffers,” although once again the differentiation between these phenotypes was of questionable clinical value. One commonly heard of pa­tients being described as having “end-stage lung disease,” the implication of course being that we had no tools of therapeutic value for those with advanced COPD. 

This nihilistic view of COPD needs to reexamined. A substantial body of evidence has grown over the past two decades, resulting in a revolution in our understanding of the pathophysiology and management of COPD. In fact, a more contemporary view of the condition paints a very different picture of COPD as “a preventable and treatable disease state characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. 

The airflow limitation is usually progressive and is associated with an abnormal in­flammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, primarily caused by cigarette smoking. Al­though COPD affects the lungs, it also produces significant systemic consequences.”[1] “Preventable,” “treatable,” “inflammatory,” and “systemic” were not words generally associated with COPD a short while back!

COPD is a major public health problem. It is the fourth leading cause of chronic morbidity and mortality and is projected to rank fifth by 2020 as a worldwide burden of disease.[2,3] Yet COPD fails to receive adequate attention from the health care community as well as from health policy decision-makers.

The goal of this and the next issue of the BCMJ is to share contemporary concepts regarding the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and management of COPD with the BC health care community. British Columbia is a hot­bed of research into the basic mechanisms at play in the development and progression of COPD. Furthermore, the BC health care community is taking a leadership role in the development of interdisciplinary chronic disease management strategies for the care of those suffering from the condition.  

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major health burden in British Columbia and throughout the world. As pointed out by Ms Camp and Dr Levy (page 80), in BC alone, over 70000 residents over the age of 45 years have COPD. COPD accounts for nearly 10000 hospitalizations each year in BC, making it the leading cause of hospital admissions (through emergency rooms). 

COPD is an epidemic not just in this province but also in the rest of Canada and the world. COPD is responsible for 120000 deaths each year in Canada and 3 million deaths worldwide. The mortality rate is expected to increase by at least 50% over the next 20 years.

Traditionally, clinicians and pa­tients have had a fatalistic attitude toward COPD, believing it to be an untreatable condition—and to a large extent this was indeed true. However, research and clinical innovations over the past two decades have made COPD a very treatable condition. As summarized by Dr Sin (see page 85), there are now several drugs that can be used to control patient symptoms and to reduce their risk of exacerbations (e.g., long-acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, combination products). 

As pointed out by Drs Al Talag and Road  (see page 90), nonpharmacologic treatments such as smoking cessation, vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and regular exercise programs are critically im­portant in improving the health and well-being of patients with COPD.

The final article in this first part, by Drs Al Talag and Wilcox (see page 97), outlines the laboratory measurements that are applied to COPD. Spirometry and oximetery have the broadest application, and a framework for the application of these tests is provided.

In the April issue of the BCMJ you can expect articles on exacerbations, multidisciplinary treatment, evaluating comorbidities, perioperative complications, and end-of-life care.

—Robert D. Levy, MD, FRCPC
Professor of Medicine, University of British Columbia; Respiratory Division, St. Paul’s Hospital
—Don D. Sin, MD, MPH, FRCPC
Associate Professor of Medicine, UBC; Respiratory Division, St. Paul’s Hospital


References

1. Celli BR, MacNee W. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Resp J 2004;23:932-946.
2. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy-lessons from the global burden of disease study. Science 1996;274:740-743.
3. World health report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. www.who/intwhr/2000/en/statistics.htm (accessed 8 January 2008).

Robert D. Levy, MD, FRCPC, Don D. Sin, MD, MPH, FRCPC,. Guest editorial: Breathing new life into old thinking. BCMJ, Vol. 50, No. 2, March, 2008, Page(s) 78 - Editorials.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply