Contemplating legacies

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 63, No. 8, October 2021, Pages 317-318 Editorials

I remember once asking one of my retired patients what he had done for a living. When I found out he had been a college professor, I asked him what he taught. After a pensive pause, where he reflected on his teaching life, he looked at me sadly and answered, “In retrospect, not a heck of a lot.”

After some 30 years as a family doctor, I often wonder what my legacy will be. Have I made a difference in my patients’ lives? I must admit that I am often rushed and spend less time with patients than I would like. This is complicated by my incessant need to be on time, which is one symptom of my obsessive-compulsive personality. I also get irritable at times and have a hard time hiding this fact. So, do I help people, or do they stay with me because they don’t really have another choice? Is there some way of measuring a career as a family physician?

There are websites such as Rate Your MD, but most individuals only post there if they have strong feelings one way or the other. As a rule, since there is no court of appeal, I don’t visit these sites. However, my patients and family members will tell me what people have posted: one guy gave me terrible scores in all categories except for punctuality. He had to admit that even though I am a terrible physician I am usually on time.

So back to my question: how do most of my patients feel about me and the service I provide? I have taken care of many of them and their families for decades, but maybe they don’t have another choice due to the shortage of family physicians. I think of many of them as my friends and care deeply about their health and happiness, but I wonder if this shows? Do they realize how much their life issues affect me? Is this caring reciprocated?

The answers to these questions came to light recently due to my wife’s illness and my sudden absence from my practice. Initially my patients were told I was away for personal reasons, but as time went on, I gave the okay for my staff to let them know that my wife is unwell. My colleagues have been exceptional and have covered most of my office shifts, but I have had to work some days because vacations were scheduled and locums already spoken for.

The outpouring of support and genuine caring that I received during these times has brought me to tears on more than one occasion. Some of my patients have also had tears in their eyes while relating how sorry they are to hear about my wife’s situation. Cards, flowers, and casseroles have appeared on a regular basis. The love and caring I have felt has filled and sustained me when I have been close to empty and overcome by sadness.

Many of my patients shared that they’ve never forgotten how much my caring meant to them when they were faced with adversity and life’s challenges. They wanted to give a little something back as a sign of appreciation for the job I have done and the relationship we have built. This is a legacy I can live with.
—David R. Richardson, MD

David R. Richardson, MD. Contemplating legacies. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 8, October, 2021, Page(s) 317-318 - Editorials.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

KELLY KUIACK says: reply

Hi Dr. Dave,
It has been a while since I have been to this site to read your delightful editorials, and a quite a few months since I have seen you in person. I am so sorry to read that your wife is ill and want you to know my thoughts and hopes for the best possible outcome are with you both.
Hope to see you in December.
Warmest regards,

Patricia Hart says: reply

There's not enough space for me to explain how much you mean to myself and my family. Prior to meeting you, I had given up on doctors. We feel so fortunate and lucky to benefit from your care and compassion. Also, your sense of humour is a major perk!

Leave a Reply