Doctors of BC published a policy paper on integrating physicians in disaster preparedness and health emergency management back in 2018. The current pandemic has again put a spotlight on this important discussion. As we plan for the postpandemic world, we need to increase disaster preparedness and health emergency management awareness, not only among physicians, but also among medical students and residents.
The call to increase awareness in disaster preparedness among medical learners is not new. The International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations published a policy statement in 2017 calling to better “incorporate disaster medicine and health emergency management into the medical curricula, balancing the biomedical and public health dimensions.” A recent systematic review of disaster training programs also highlighted that when medical schools incorporate these programs for medical students, they improve their preparedness, skills, and knowledge—especially during times of pandemic.
In Canada, there is an expectation from the public for physicians to be prepared for, respond to, and manage the consequences of a disaster. Although medical schools acknowledged that expectation, forty-six percent of the surveyed medical schools do not teach disaster medicine to learners.
To address this gap in medical training, there exist many frameworks and examples. For instance, the National Collaborative for Disaster Health Education and Research in Australia developed a framework to guide disaster preparedness training and to ensure consistency and ease of implementation. Ashcroft and colleagues also demonstrated the effectiveness of using multimodal formats and suggested a structure for disaster preparedness training based on their systematic review. Even simple, classroom-based interactive discussions resulted in improved knowledge among students.
The current pandemic has shown us that a disaster doesn’t just affect a few specialties, such as public health, emergency, critical care, and family medicine; it can have impacts on all disciplines of medicine. While we cannot predict when another disaster or health emergency will happen, we can do our best to raise awareness and competency among our learners—help them understand the basics of disaster preparedness and become better equipped to respond to health emergencies both as learners and as future physicians.
By incorporating disaster preparedness early in the medical curriculum, we help learners build reflexes early on in their training. We also create a culture that is fundamental to integrating physicians in disaster preparedness and health emergency management.
Recovery in the postpandemic world cannot mean merely returning to the old ways. The new normal requires us not to build back, but rather to build back better.
—Derek C. Chang, MD
—Graham Dodd, MD
Members, Emergency and Public Safety Committee
This article is the opinion of the Emergency and Public Safety Committee, a subcommittee of Doctors of BC’s Council on Health Promotion, and is not necessarily the opinion of Doctors of BC. This article has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.
1. Doctors of BC. Improving collaboration in times of crisis: Integrating physicians in disaster preparedness and health emergency management. 2018. Accessed 26 May 2021. www.doctorsofbc.ca/sites/default/files/disaster_preparedness_policy_paper_web_id_235753.pdf.
2. Integrated Federation of Medical Students’ Association. IFMSA policy document – disaster and emergency management. 2017. Accessed 26 May 2021. https://ifmsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GS_2017AM_Policy_Disaster-and-Emergency-Management.pdf.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org