Audits reveal that prolonged counseling fee codes (00120, 12120, 12220, 13220, 15220, 16120, 17120, 18120, 00314, 33314, 33014, 00514, 01714, 31014, 32014, 33214, 33314, 33414, 33514, 33614, 33714) are frequently billed incorrectly.
With the support of the Patterns of Practice Committee (POPC), a regular column will appear in the BC Medical Journal that provides information on the most common billing errors discovered during practice reviews and audits. The POPC is committed to providing ongoing education and information to Doctors of BC members.
Counseling is defined in the Preamble (D.3.3) to the Doctors of BC Guide to Fees as “the discussion with the patient, caregiver, spouse or relative about a medical condition which is recognized as difficult by the medical profession or over which the patient is having significant emotional distress, including the management of malignant disease.”
General practitioners or specialists should not bill the prolonged counseling fee codes for advice that is a normal component of any visit or as a substitute for the usual patient examination fee. Medical inspectors look for proper documentation in the patient’s record to support the criteria to bill prolonged counseling fee codes—a short summary, advice given, and start and end times (at least 20 minutes). Having little or no documentation in your clinical records to support your claim is interpreted as “you didn’t do the work.”
Audits reveal that physicians commonly bill the prolonged counseling fee codes incorrectly for the following services. These services do not qualify under the codes:
• Explanation of test results, multiple problems that took 20 minutes or more.
• Initial or introductory visits to the practice by new patients.
• Travel advice, lifestyle advice.
• Visits for mental health problems that are stable.
• Renewal of prescriptions or a follow-up visit.
Always refer to the Doctors of BC Guide to Fees and its Preamble for interpretations of all fees.
—Keith J. White, MD
Chair, Patterns of Practice Committee
For further information contact Juanita Grant, Audit and Billing Advisor, Physician and External Affairs, at 604 638-2829 or email@example.com.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org