The informed consent paradox

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 63, No. 10, December 2021, Page 445 Back Page

The complexities presented when an essential feature of ethical medical practice is confronted by those with cognitive decline.

Obtaining informed consent from patients undergoing various medical procedures is an essential feature of ethical medical practice. In the context of requesting medical assistance in dying (MAID), a primary requirement is that the applicant fully understands what is going to happen.

I was mulling over this requirement when I celebrated my 66th wedding anniversary on my own. My lifelong partner was biologically alive, bedridden in the full grip of amnesia, agnosia, aphasia, and apraxia at the time, until she recently passed away. It was about 8 years ago when she began her slide into one of the dementias—it’s still not clear which one. She slept, or as we interpreted it, she was “totally out of it,” much of the day. We didn’t know if she could see, and if so, what she saw. She may or may not have heard, but she did not respond. She could not turn or adjust her position in bed. She was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Her skin was fragile and broke down easily. She had skin problems in her sacral area, which were difficult to manage. She sometimes screamed or yelled in a defensive manner even when she was just being gently attended by her kind caregivers. During the night, even with some sedatives, she tended to scratch her eyes or face vehemently while emitting to us meaningless sounds. She chewed and chewed her pureed, pasty food, offered to her by the half teaspoon. Eventually, she would swallow.

We cared for my very much loved wife at home until recently, when she was moved to a long-term care facility, essentially in a vegetative state. Knowing her, I believed that, if she could consider it, she would have preferred to be on a rocket to another planet. But because she existed only on a basic biological level, it was impossible for her to ask for or give consent to a medically assisted exit from Earth. And therein lies the paradox of the informed consent requirement when applied to those with cognitive decline.

On one hand, the present rules are that neither representation agreements nor power of attorney arrangements could speak on her behalf in her situation. On the other hand, her care, or more precisely, the care of her body, had been taken over by caregivers and medical specialists without her consent. In her predementia life, she was a very private person and would never give consent to some of the well-meaning but intimate, invasive care. Ironically, that humanitarian, loving care likely prolonged her vegetative state and even robbed her of a chance for an earlier, natural death.

Oddly enough there is a widely accepted provision in certain medical situations that potentially provides exit from life without informed consent. For the last number of years, ambulance crews entering a house first look for a document that is supposed to be displayed on household refrigerators. If signed, the document certifies that the person named declines to give permission for resuscitation procedures, even if they might prolong life. The signature implies that, if it comes to it, death would be accepted as preferable to a postresuscitation-related chronic physical or cognitive decline. This scenario resembles the concerns of many well persons anxious about their future in case of the onset of a cognitive decline.

Following the principle of the no-resuscitation instruction on a piece of signed paper attached to the refrigerator, it would be logical to accept the formal, registered, bona fide request of a still well-functioning person in the presence of a physician: “I wish to receive medical assistance in dying if or when I reach a such and such stage of dementia.” The statement should be formally supported by significant family members. This prestated request could then be called upon by the family at the agreed-upon exit point, and when the time came, it could be accepted as informed consent and honored with understanding and love.

As things are today, Canada’s MAID law is under revision to include people with mental illness in the future. That will be an important step forward, but dementia is a brain disorder with devastating physical consequences, and persons with severely declining cognitive function need to be given special consideration.


This article has been peer reviewed.


Dr Szasz is a member of the Order of Canada and professor emeritus at the UBC Faculty of Medicine. Throughout his career he practised on the North Shore and worked for the UBC Faculty of Medicine in numerous positions. After retiring from UBC, he was a member and chair of the Medical Advisory Committee of the Library of the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons. Now in his 93rd year, he continues rowing at the Vancouver Rowing Club and writing for the BCMJ blog.

George Szasz, CM, MD. The informed consent paradox. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 10, December, 2021, Page(s) 445 - Back Page.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply