Modern-day cardiac auscultatory teaching and its role alongside echocardiography

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 61 , No. 3 , April 2019 , Pages 128-130 MDs To Be

ABSTRACT: In the hands of a skilled user, the stethoscope is a quick, inexpensive, and readily available way to screen and assess patients for cardiac pathology at initial point of care. Unfortunately, reliance on sophisticated diagnostic technologies such as echocardiography and, more importantly, outdated auscultatory teaching methods has led to a decline in practitioners’ ability to correctly identify heart sounds through auscultation. Current research shows cardiac auscultatory teaching should place more emphasis on auditory repetition in conjunction with visual integration, testing, and scheduled refresher learning of heart sounds. This can be done in an accessible, affordable, and self-paced manner through online or phone applications. Proficient cardiac auscultation and new diagnostic technologies have the potential to work synergistically with one another to improve patient outcomes.

Maximizing physicians’ cardiac auscultatory abilities alongside use of advanced diagnostic technologies results in better diagnostic accuracy and increased patient interaction.


The stethoscope has been a part of the physician’s toolkit for over 200 years since its invention in 1816 by French physician Rene Laennec.[1] Binaural, electronic, and more recently, iPhone stethoscopes with the ability to amplify, record, and share heart sounds are options for health care professionals to use in their daily practice.[2] Auscultation serves as a quick and inexpensive way for the modern-day physician to infer a variety of disease states about the cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal system, which allows for streamlined diagnoses and management. However, with long patient lists, access to sophisticated diagnostic technology, and stagnant auscultatory teaching methods, more time is being spent combing through patient electronic medical records rather than examining and auscultating the patient. The identification of auscultated heart sounds among most medical students,[3-5] residents,[4-6] and physicians[5,7-9] is poor. Practitioners at all levels of training find it difficult to identify and distinguish pathological from normal heart sounds, which can lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment, as well as unnecessary, potentially harmful investigations.

Auscultation or echocardiography?

The decline in physicians’ ability to identify auscultated heart sounds could be due, in part, to the widespread introduction and reliance on advanced diagnostic technologies such as echocardiography.[10] The diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography is superior to auscultation when identifying many subtle cardiac pathologies, and has the capability to improve detection over cardiac auscultation alone.[11-14] Relatively recent advances in medical technology have led to the development of handheld ultrasound devices that can be used at the initial point of care to assess cardiac function. Cardiologists using handheld ultrasound outperformed cardiologists using physical examination with auscultation for identifying the majority of common cardiac pathologies.[15] Medical schools are beginning to incorporate ultrasonography early into their undergraduate curriculum as a regular part of the physical examination.[16] Proponents of point-of-care ultrasound acknowledge the relatively high risk of misdiagnosis among inexperienced practitioners.[16] Even with experienced ultrasonographers, there are circumstances where echocardiography misses cardiac pathology that the stethoscope is able to pick up. Dr Valentine Fuster describes one of many such clinical situations, where a pericardial rub is heard through auscultation in a patient with chest pain and fever, despite echocardiography’s inability to show any pericardial effusion.[17] The existence of better tests does not negate the stethoscope, but rather, pushes us to understand its limitations and value alongside cardiac auscultation in the physical examination.

Modern-day cardiac auscultatory teaching

Apart from technological advances, a compelling reason for poor auscultatory heart sound identification is that teaching methods for cardiac auscultation among medical programs has not changed much over the last half century.[18] Current evidence-based cardiac auscultatory teaching methods involving online platforms and phone applications have the potential to revitalize cardiac auscultation in medical programs.[19] The technical auditory skill of recognizing abnormal from normal heart sounds, extra heart sounds, and common pathological murmurs during auscultation tends to be inadequately taught, and consequently, poorly understood by medical students. Accurate heart sound identification requires the brain to be able to recognize the volume, frequency, and timing of sounds.[20] This skill can only be developed by hearing many repetitions of the same, often subtle sound, in order to incorporate that new pattern of sound into long-term memory.[20] Multiple studies have shown that auditory training, compared to traditional teaching methods, can markedly advance a learner’s ability to recognize abnormal from normal heart sounds, extra heart sounds, and common pathological murmurs.[7,21-23] In addition to benefiting novice and intermediate learners, cardiologists significantly improved their identification of basic and advanced murmurs after listening to 400 repetitions of each murmur while viewing cardiac images.[7] Auditory training is a promising technique that should be paired with visual animations of the hemodynamics and valvular actions of the given sound,[24-26] in addition to skill testing and scheduled refresher learning.[18,21,27] Such training allows the learner to visualize the flow of blood through the heart and best understand the pathophysiology responsible for the given sound, extending retention.[25] Testing and periodic refresher learning ensure a high degree of competency has been reached and will be maintained over time.

Computers, smart phones, and heart sounds

Successfully incorporating the required cardiac auditory repetition into the schedules of medical students and practising professionals poses a challenge. However, with the increasing range of Internet connectedness and use of cellphones, this challenge can be overcome. The American College of Cardiology and Teaching Heart Auscultation to Health Professionals websites offer free online auditory training programs with hundreds of repetitions of various hearts sounds, training assessments, and downloadable mp3 files for offline use on a computer or smart phone.[28,29] Blaufuss Medical Multimedia Laboratories has also created a free online platform for learning four common valvular lesions using auditory repetitions of heart sounds combined with interactive computer animations and detailed text.[30] In addition to the online platforms, there are a variety of smart phone applications available, such as HeartMurmurs and Murmur Pro that offer auditory repetitions in combination with visual aids, descriptions, and quizzes to assess competence. The online platforms, and more specifically, the phone-based applications, offer a low-cost, flexible, and effective medium for incorporating evidence-based auscultatory teaching into the schedules of health care professionals.


Cardiac auscultatory skills can work synergistically with new diagnostic technologies like point-of-care ultrasound. Cardiac auscultatory teaching methods should be modernized by incorporating auditory repetition to hone technical auscultation skills, using concurrent visualizations to improve conceptual understanding of cardiac pathology, and employing testing and periodic refresher sessions to ensure long-term knowledge retention. Online platforms and phone applications offer a portable learning medium that is affordable, readably accessible, and self-paced for mastering the technical and conceptual aspects of cardiac auscultation, in addition to the basic foundational knowledge and physical exam skills already being taught in medical schools and residency. Maximizing cardiac auscultatory ability instills confidence and encourages physical examination alongside advanced diagnostic technologies, resulting in better diagnostic accuracy, increased patient interaction, and more importantly, human connection.

This article has been peer reviewed.


1.    Roguin A. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laennec (1781-1826): The man behind the stethoscope. Clin Med Res 2006;4:230-235.

2.    Patel RS, Schwarz J, Danesh V, et al. Clinical performance of the HeartBuds, an electronic smartphone listening device, compared to FDA approved class I and class II stethoscopes. J Mob Technol Med 2016;5:1:45-51.

3.    Vukanovic-Criley JM, Criley S, Warde CM, et al. Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: A multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:610-616.

4.    Mangione S, Nieman LZ. Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. JAMA 1997;278:717-722.

5.    Mangione S, Nieman LZ, Gracely E, Kaye D. The teaching and practice of cardiac auscultation during internal medicine and cardiology training. A nationwide survey. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:47-54.

6.    Mangione S. Cardiac auscultatory skills of physicians-in-training: A comparison of three English-speaking countries. Am J Med 2001;110:210-216.

7.    Barrett MJ, Martinez MW, Pieretti J. The power of repetition in mastering cardiac auscultation. In: Finley J, ed. Teaching heart auscultation to health professionals: Methods for improving the practice of an ancient but critical skill. Halifax, NS: Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association; 2011.

8.    Vukanovic-Criley JM, Hovanesyan A, Criley SR, et al. Confidential testing of cardiac examination competency in cardiology and noncardiology faculty and trainees: A multicenter study. Clin Cardiol 2010;33:738-745.

9.    Roy D, Sargeant J, Gray J, et al. Helping family physicians improve their cardiac auscultation skills with an interactive CD-ROM. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:152-159.

10.    Chizner MA. Cardiac auscultation: Rediscovering the lost art. Curr Probl Cardiol 2008;33:326-408.

11.    Patel A, Tomar NS, Bharani A. Utility of physical examination and comparison to echocardiography for cardiac diagnosis. Indian Heart J 2017;69:141-145.

12.    Spencer KT, Anderson AS, Bhargava A, et al. Physician-performed point-of-care echocardiography using a laptop platform compared with physical examination in the cardiovascular patient. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2013-2018.

13.    Rahko PS. Prevalence of regurgitant murmurs in patients with valvular regurgitation detected by Doppler echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:466-472.

14.    Jaffe WM, Roche AH, Coverdale HA, et al. Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease. Circulation 1988;78:267-275.

15.    Mehta M, Jacobson T, Peters D, et al. Handheld ultrasound versus physical examination in patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography for a suspected cardiac condition. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:983-990.

16.    Solomon SD, Saldana F. Point-of-care ultrasound in medical education—stop listening and look. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1083-1085.

17.    Fuster V. The stethoscope’s prognosis: Very much alive and very necessary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1118-1119.

18.    Barrett MJ, Mackie AS, Finley JP. Cardiac auscultation in the modern era: Premature requiem or phoenix rising? Cardiol Rev 2017;25:205-210.

19.    Mackie A. Auscultation: A review of teaching methods. In: Finley J. Teaching heart auscultation to health professionals: Methods for improving the practice of an ancient but critical skill. Halifax, NS: Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association; 2011.

20.    Atienza M, Cantero JL, Dominguez-Marin E. The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem 2002;9:138-150.

21.    Finley JP, Caissie R, Nicol P, Hoyt B. International trial of online auditory training programme for distinguishing innocent and pathological murmurs. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:815-819.

22.    Barrett MJ, Kuzma MA, Seto TC, et al. The power of repetition in mastering cardiac auscultation. Am J Med 2006;119:73-75.

23.    Barrett MJ, Lacey CS, Sekara AE, et al. Mastering cardiac murmurs: The power of repetition. Chest 2004;126:470-475.

24.    Moshman S. Teaching of Cardiac Auscultation. Cardiol Rev 2017;25:203-204.

25.    Vukanovic-Criley JM, Boker JR, Criley SR, et al. Using virtual patients to improve cardiac examination competency in medical students. Clin Cardiol 2008;31:334-339.

26.    Torre DM, Pfeifer KJ, Lamb GC, et al. An assessment of the impact of multimedia, technology-based learning tools on the cardiac auscultation skills of third-year medical students. Med Educ Online 2004;9:4364.

27.    Lam MZ, Lee TJ, Boey PY, et al. Factors influencing cardiac auscultation proficiency in physician trainees. Singapore Med J 2005;46:11-14.

28.    American College of Cardiology. Heart songs for institutions: Heart sounds. Accessed 21 July 2018.

29.    Teaching Heart Auscultation to Health Professionals. Learning Programs. Accessed 31 December 2018.

30.    Blaufuss Medical Multimedia Laboratories. Heart sounds and cardiac arrhythmias. Tutorials. Accessed 1 October 2018.

Mr Roda is a medical student in the Vancouver Fraser Medical Program, class of 2020, at the UBC Faculty of Medicine.

Caleb A.N. Roda, BSKin. Modern-day cardiac auscultatory teaching and its role alongside echocardiography. BCMJ, Vol. 61, No. 3, April, 2019, Page(s) 128-130 - MDs To Be.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply