Incidental tumor retrieval during point-of-care-ultrasound-guided thoracentesis

Pathology examination of drainage contents from thoracentesis, especially in cases of suspected malignancy, could spare patients further invasive procedures.


Clinical summary

While vacationing in Mexico, a woman in her 70s presented to primary care with a 6-month history of B symptoms, worsening dyspnea, and new-onset back pain. Her medical history included treated ductal carcinoma in situ and a 50-pack-year smoking history. Diagnostic imaging revealed liver, lung, and bone lesions. A liver biopsy was inconclusive, identifying only an undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary. The woman was advised to return to Canada for ongoing investigation.

Upon presentation to a Canadian emergency department, the woman was hypoxic and minimally ambulatory. Chest X-ray showed a large left pleural effusion [Figure 1]. CT imaging showed a large left pleural effusion, multiple spiculated nodules in the left lung, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and liver lesions [Figure 2]. Tumor markers CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA-125 were elevated.

 

FIGURE 1. Initial chest X-ray showing a large left pleural effusion. FIGURE 2. CT image demonstrating a large left pleural effusion, spiculated lung nodules, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and liver lesions.

 

Given these findings, a diagnostic and therapeutic bedside point-of-care-ultrasound-guided thoracentesis was performed. The imaging revealed a bulky and ragged pleural membrane at the apex of the left lung, with a consolidated lung edge floating in a hypoechoic pocket of pleural effusion with evidence of swirling debris suggestive of an exudative process [Figure 3].

After drainage of 1.2 L of serosanguinous fluid, a 3 to 4 cm globular fibrous tissue fragment was noted in the collection bag and was sent for analysis [Figure 4]. The patient’s hypoxia improved postprocedure. No pneumothorax was observed in the postprocedural chest X-ray.

 

FIGURE 3. Point-of-care ultrasound scan showing debris within the pleural fluid, suggestive of an exudative effusion. FIGURE 4. Mass collected during thoracentesis.

 

Histopathology of the retrieved tissue confirmed metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. A subsequent PET scan confirmed widespread metastases. The patient opted for palliative care and died shortly after diagnosis.

This case highlights an unusual yet valuable diagnostic outcome of thoracentesis. Tumor tissue incidentally retrieved during fluid drainage led to a rapid diagnosis, sparing the patient further invasive procedures. Proceduralists may consider pathology examination of drainage contents, especially in cases of suspected malignancy.

Patient consent

Consent for the use of the patient’s images was obtained from the patient’s substitute decision-maker in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines. The substitute decision-maker provided informed consent after being fully apprised of the purpose and scope of the publication.

Funding

None declared.

Competing interests

None declared.


This article has been peer reviewed.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Dr Ng* is a second-year radiology resident at the University of British Columbia. Dr Saleh* is a second-year internal medicine resident at UBC. Dr Wiskar is a clinical professor in the Division of General Internal Medicine in the Department of Medicine at UBC and a general internal medicine physician at Vancouver General Hospital. Dr Leung is an adjunct professor in infectious diseases at the University of Western Ontario. Dr Morrison is a clinical instructor in the Division of General Internal Medicine in the Department of Medicine at UBC and a general internal medicine physician at Vancouver General Hospital and St. Paul’s Hospital.

* Co–first authors

B. Ng, PharmD, MD, N. Saleh, MD, Katie Wiskar, MD, FRCPC, W. Leung, MD, S. Morrison, MD, FRCPC. Incidental tumor retrieval during point-of-care-ultrasound-guided thoracentesis. BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 9, November, 2025, Page(s) 324-325 - Clinical Images.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply