Diabetic blood sugar control: An urban/rural comparison

Diabetes mellitus type II is now a leading cause of death, illness, and disability across North America. British Columbians living in northern and rural communities have poorer health compared with those living in urban communities. In an attempt to see whether this poor health is due in part to suboptimal management of rural diabetics, blood sugar control (glycosylated hemoglobin) and diabetic care of diabetics (N = 85) living in an isolated rural community (Bella Coola Valley) was compared with that of diabetics (N = 79) attending an urban family practice clinic in Vancouver. Bella Coola diabetics had more clinic-based diabetic education and fewer referrals to endocrinologists compared with their Vancouver counterparts. There was no difference in mean HgAIc value between Bella Coola and UBC diabetics, and both populations had about the same proportion of diabetics on insulin.


British Columbians living in northern and rural communities have poorer health than their urban counterparts. Is suboptimal management of rural diabetics part of the reason?


Introduction

Bella Coola is a rural, remote community located in northwestern British Columbia. The closest referral hospital, in Williams Lake, is more than 450 km by road; the closest tertiary-care centre is in Vancouver, a 2-hour flight. The hospital in this community is one of the 10 most isolated physician-staffed health facilities in British Columbia (Table 1).[1] The Northern Isolation Allowance (NIA) score—a measure of community rurality—for Bella Coola is 130. Only Dease Lake and New Aiyansh have higher NIA scores, but neither has a fully staffed hospital like Bella Coola’s. The physicians working in Bella Coola serve an estimated clinic population of 2750 people.[2] Each year these physicians see more than 8000 patients in the clinic and 2500 patients in emergency, admit 400 patients to hospital, and deliver 20 to 30 babies.[3] Bella Coola is also a rural training site for University of British Columbia’s Family Physician Residency Program.

Bella Coola is one of five communities located in the Cariboo region that has a physician-staffed health facility (Table 2). The Cariboo region is known to be among the unhealthiest regions not only in British Columbia, but in all of Canada.[4,5] In the provincial health officer’s annual report for 1996, for example, the age standardized mortality rates for the Cariboo Health Region* (53.0/10 000 standard population) was almost one-and-a-half times that of health regions in the Lower Mainland (e.g., in the Richmond Health Region* it was 39.8/10 000 standard population).[5] The provincial health officer believes that these health region inequities are due mainly to differences in socioeconomic conditions.[5] Other factors may also play a role. Relative lack of specialists and low long-term family physician retention rates (lack of physician continuity) are also associated with poor health in these health regions.[6-8]

* The BC government reorganized the health regions into health authorities and health service delivery areas in April 2002, but these older terms have been retained because they reflect the data discussed in this article.

The poor health reported for northern health regions may also be due to the greater percentage of aboriginal people who live in these areas.[2,6] Native people in British Columbia, across Canada, and across North America have more health problems per capita—both physical and psychosocial—than non-native people.[5,9-11] Looking at mortality rates, for example, the infant death rate for aboriginals is over twice that for all of Canada; the death rate from injury and poisonings is four times the Canadian average; the suicide rate among 15- to 19-year-old natives is six times the Canadian rate; and death from diabetes is six times the Canadian average.[5,9,12-15]

Diabetes mellitus type II is now a leading cause of death, illness, and disability across North America. It affects an estimated 18 million North Americans and 1.5 million Canadians.[16-18] Having diabetes substantially increases the risk of an adult developing blindness, end stage renal disease, and lower limb amputations, and increases the risk of dying from coronary artery disease, stroke, or peripheral vascular disease.[19,20]

Diabetes treatment guidelines

Recent studies have shown that keeping blood sugar levels within normal range reduces the chances of developing at least some of the complications associated with having diabetes.[21-24] Consequently, the mainstay of diabetes type II treatment is now currently focused on achieving better glucose control through diet, exercise, and medications.[25-29][16,24] Initial and ongoing education of the patient with diabetes should be an integral part of diabetes management and not merely an adjunct to treatment. Whenever possible, diabetic patients should receive dietary advice from a registered dietitian. If adequate blood sugar levels have not been reached on a regimen that includes appropriate use of diet, exercise, and oral agents, then insulin therapy should be initiated to improve diabetic control.[16] According to the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), intensive insulin therapy prevents microvascular complications in patients with diabetes type II.[22][30] A prospective study showed that insulin treatment improves glycemia for a long period (9 years) in normal weight and moderately obese patients who develop secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents.[31] Two studies go one step further to recommend early use of insulin for patients with diabetes type II when non-drug therapies fail to achieve individual goals. Their rationale is that if insulin is started early enough, endogenous insulin secretion might transiently or partly recover, reducing overall insulin requirements.[30,32,33] According to Canadian and American practice guidelines, glycosylated hemoglobin (HgAIc)—a laboratory blood test—should be measured every 3 to 4 months in all patients taking insulin and at least every 6 months in people on nutrition therapy and/or oral hypoglycemic agents. Recent evidence support that near normalization of HgAIc levels (<7.0 – 7.5) represents a rational goal for younger type II diabetic patients (<65 year of age). For patients older than 65 years, prevention of diabetes-related symptoms becomes the main therapeutic goal.

In British Columbia there are about 80 fully accredited diabetes teaching centres (Table 3 and Table 4) that provide education and support to people with diabetes, their families, and their friends. These diabetes teaching centres are also referred to as diabetes education centres. Most are staffed by nurses and dietitians, as well as other health professionals—including physicians.[34,35] Isolated rural communities such as Bella Coola lack the volume of patients and the number of health professionals (e.g., dietitians) required to run a fully accredited diabetes education centre. In Bella Coola, a nurse practitioner sees the diabetics and reviews diet, while physicians typically review whether the recommended diabetes monitoring guidelines are being followed.

Urban/rural treatment differences?

In an attempt to see whether diabetics living in an isolated rural community have poorer blood sugar control compared with diabetics attending an urban family practice clinic—who would have easier access to a diabetes education centre—we compared glycosylated hemoglobin (HgAIc) values and diabetic care received by Bella Coola diabetics to diabetics attending a University of British Columbia family practice clinic located in Vancouver (the Family Practice Teaching Unit on Fairview Avenue). The questions we are trying to answer through these data are:

• Are there differences in HgAIc values between the two sites? 

• What percentage of patients with HgAIc values 0.08 are on insulin at the two sites?

• Did referring the patient to a diabetic teaching program, which includes endocrine assessment, result in lower levels of HgAIc?

Methods

Two lists of diabetes mellitus type II patients were compiled. One list included all the known diabetics attending a rural family practice site (Bella Coola Medical Clinic); the second list included all the known diabetics attending two urban family practice sites (UBC Family Practice Teaching Units). Patients with diabetes mellitus type I were excluded from this study. There were 85 known diabetics attending the rural family practice clinic, and 79 known diabetics attending the urban family practice clinic. Charts were reviewed retrospectively for the following:

• Date and value of most recent HgAIc.

• Whether the patient received diabetic education.

• Details of patient’s management: diet, hypoglycemic, or insulin.

• Whether the patient was referred to a diabetic teaching centre, where a visit typically consists of 3 days of intensive diabetic teaching and an endocrine consultation.

Results/discussion

There is no gender difference between the two sites (Table 5). The mean age of Vancouver diabetics (64.5 ± 13 years) was significantly greater (P <0.01) than the mean age of the Bella Coola diabetics (59.2 ± 11 years). This finding is consistent with the 1996 census report that gives the percentage of population older than 64 years as 7% for the Bella Coola Valley and 13% for the Vancouver Health Region.[2] More of the urban diabetics (88.6%) had an HgAIc value collected within the past 6 months (P <0.05) as compared to the rural diabetics (65.9%). In both the urban and rural diabetic groups, having an HgAIc done in the last 6 months was not related to the type of treatment (i.e., insulin, oral hypoglycemics, or diet modifications), whether the patient received a consultation or diabetic education. The use of timely reminders for diabetic assessment and management is something both rural and urban clinics may wish to consider, particularly for following diabetics taking insulin.

Within the Bella Coola diabetic group, a significant relationship was found between patients with HgAIc0.08 and being on insulin (P = 0.03), being on an oral hypoglycemic (P<0.002), and being referred for consultation and attending diabetic teaching centres in Vancouver (P = 0.0075). There was no relationship between patients with HgAIc 0.08 and receiving diabetic education, presumably because all the diabetics in this group received diabetic education.

Within the urban diabetic group there was no statistically significant relationship between patients with HgAIc0.08 and being started on insulin (P = 0.051), being on an oral hypoglycemic (P = 0.86), being referred for consultation (P = 0.13), or receiving diabetic education (P = 0.82). The lack of correlation between patients having HgAIc 0.08 and being on insulin may simply reflect the fact that the patients were started on insulin in the distant past and blood sugar control improved over time. Lack of correlation between patients having HgAIc 0.08 and referral to an endocrinologist reflects the fact that urban family physicians are more likely to refer all their diabetics to a diabetic teaching centre than are rural family physicians.

Bella Coola diabetics received more clinic-based diabetic education than did the Vancouver diabetics (P <0.01). This is probably due to the presence of a public health nurse at the Bella Coola Medical Clinic who is actively involved in providing diabetic education to patients at the time of their diagnosis and periodically thereafter. Urban diabetics were more likely (P = 0.01) to have been referred to a diabetic teaching centre and had an endocrine consultation when compared with the rural diabetics. The lower percentage of rural diabetics being referred for consultation at a diabetic teaching centre probably reflects the fact that rural diabetics must travel greater distances, spend more money, and make a greater time commitment than their urban counterparts.

Despite the differences in diabetic care between the two groups, there was no significant difference in mean HgAIc values or in the proportion of diabetic patients recording HgAIc values 0.08 between the two sites (Table 5). However, when HgAIc values are divided into categories, more of the rural diabetics had an HgAIc value of <0.06 compared with the urban diabetics. While nearly one-third of the patients in both groups have an HgAIc value 0.08, only a few of these patients (8 out of 30 in Bella Coola and 6 out of 26 in Vancouver) are on insulin. Diabetics attending the UBC Family Practice Teaching Unit were significantly more likely (P <0.03) to be taking oral hypoglycemics compared with diabetics attending the Bella Coola Medical Clinic, who were more likely to be managed by diet and exercise.

Both clinics appear to have a conservative approach toward using insulin in patients with suboptimal control (i.e., HgAIc value0.08). Based on the previously mentioned studies, near normal glycemic control is a reasonable goal and insulin should be used whenever oral hypoglycemics fail to achieve the target HgAIc value.

Limitations

The two patient populations are not strictly comparable in that people living in Bella Coola Valley tend to be younger than their Vancouver counterparts. Also, proportionately more First Nations people live in the Bella Coola Valley (40% of the population) as compared with the Greater Vancouver region (2% of the population). A detailed profile of the Bella Coola diabetic population—age, sex, ethnicity, nutrition recalls, quality of life scores, complication rates—is being put together in the hope we can better understand the role of these factors in this rural diabetic patient population.

Conclusion

Despite the fact that diabetics living in the rural and isolated community of Bella Coola are referred less frequently to diabetic treatment centres and endocrinologists when compared with diabetics attending an urban family practice clinic in Vancouver, there was no significant difference between the two sites in mean HgAIc values, in the proportion of diabetic patients recording HgAIc values 0.08, or in the proportion of diabetics on insulin. If these results can be generalized to other rural communities in the Cariboo region, it would appear that the poor health reported for this region is not due to inferior management of diabetics.

Competing interests

None declared.

Table 1. Ten most isolated physician-staffed health facilities in BC.

Community

Dease
Lake

New
Aiyansh

Bella
Coola

Hudson
Hope

Massett

Queen
Charlotte
City

Stewart

Waglisla

Tumbler
Ridge

Chetwynd

NIA score

155

135

130

130

130

130

130

130

117

116

Estimated clinic
population

1800

1688

2750

1125

2862

2739

1195

1569

3708

6330

Number of physicians

1

1

5

1

5

1

2

2

2

4

Number of full-time
equivalents

2

2

3

1

2

3

2

3

3

2

Physician payment

Salary

Salary

Salary

FFS

Salary

Salary

Salary

Salary

FFS

FFS

Obstetrics services

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Population 0-4 years

9%

10%

8%

8%

10%

8%

7%

9%

9%

9%

Population 65 years

5%

6%

7%

8%

5%

5%

3%

6%

1%

5%

Population aboriginal

52%

96%

40%

4%

35%

29%

3%

74%

3%

14%

Unemployment rate

14%

33%

13%

12%

12%

13%

26%

22%

5%

11%

Percent with
<Grade 9 education

8%

18%

10%

10%

10%

12%

7%

17%

4%

10%

Health care facility type

DTC

DTC

Hospital

DTC

Hospital

Hospital

Hospital

Hospital

DTC

Hospital

DTC = Diagnostic and treatment centre FFS = Fee for service

Table 2. Physician-staffed health facilities in Cariboo region.

Community

Waglisla Bella
Coola
Hundred
Mile
House
Williams
Lake
Quesnel

Estimated clinic population

1569

2750

18 998

22 219

25 360

Population 0 - 4 years

9%

8%

6%

7%

7%

Population 65 years

6%

7%

9%

8%

8%

Population aboriginal

74%

40%

6%

13%

6%

Unemployment rate

22%

13%

14%

12%

13%

Percent with <Grade 9 education

17%

10%

8%

9%

10%

Health care facility

Hospital

Hospital

Hospital

Hospital

Hospital

Physicians*

2

5

14

32

30

Physician payment system

Salary

Salary

Fee for
service

Fee for
service

Fee for
service

Obstetric services

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NIA score

130

130

51

<32

38

*From the College of Physicians and Surgeons' 2000-2001 Medical Directory

Table 3. Diabetes education centres in British Columbia accepting self-referrals.

Name of education centre

Contact phone number

Boundary Hospital

(250) 443-2136

Cariboo Memorial Hospital

(250) 398-4904

Chinese Community Diabetic Education Society

(604) 889-8267

Dawson Creek and District Hospital

(250) 782-8501 local 279

Kitimat General Hospital

(250) 632-8313

Kootenay Lake District Hospital

(250) 352-3111 local 7431

Mission Memorial Hospital

(604) 814-5108

South Asian Diabetes Education Centre

(604) 321-6151

Chinese Diabetes Education Centre

(604) 684-1628

Queen Charlotte Islands General Hospital

(250) 626-3918

South Okanagan Similkameen Diabetes Program

1 800 707-8550

For more information, please contact the Diabetes Resource Centre, Canadian Diabetes Association, 360 - 1385 West 8th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V9. 1 800 268-4656, info@bc.diabetes.ca.

Table 4. Diabetes centres requiring a doctor's referral.

Community

Diabetes education centre

 

Community

Diabetes education centre

100 Mile House

100 Mile District General Hospital

 

Nelson

Kootenay Lake District Hospital

Abbotsford

Matsqui-Sumas-Abbotsford General Hospital

 

New Westminster

Royal Columbian Hospital

Armstrong

Pleasant Valley Health Centre

 

New Westminster

St Mary's Hospital

Ashcroft

Ashcroft and District General Hospital

 

North Vancouver

Lions Gate Hospital

Burnaby

Burnaby Hospital

 

Oliver

South Okanagan General Hospital

Burns Lake Lakes District Hospital and Health Centre  

Parksville

Mount Arrowsmith Diabetes Education Centre

Campbell River

Campbell River and District Hospital

 

Penticton

Penticton Health Unit

Castlegar

Castlegar and District Hospital

 

Port Alberni

West Coast General Hospital

Chase

Chase and District Health Centre

 

Port McNeill

Port McNeill and District Hospital

Chetwynd

Peace Liard Health Centre

 

Powell River

Powell River Community Health Council

Chilliwack

Chilliwack General Hospital

 

Prince George

Prince George Regional Hospital

Comox

St. Joseph's General Hospital

 

Prince Rupert

Prince Rupert Regional Hospital

Coquitlam

Eagle Ridge Hospital

 

Princeton

Princeton Health Unit

Cranbrook

Cranbrook Regional Hospital

 

Queen Charlotte City

Queen Charlotte Islands General Hospital

Creston

Creston Valley Hospital

 

Quesnel

G.R. Baker Memorial Hospital

Dawson Creek

Dawson Creek and District Hospital

 

Revelstoke

Queen Victoria Hospital

Delta

Delta Hospital

 

Richmond

Richmond Hospital

Duncan

Cowichan District Hospital

 

Saanichton

Saanich Peninsula Hospital

Elkford

Elkford Diagnostic and Treatment Centre

 

Salmon Arm

Shuswap Health Services

Enderby

Enderby Hospital

 

Smithers

Bulkley Valley District Hospital

Fernie

Fernie and District Hospital

 

Sparwood

Elk Valley Diabetes Teaching Centre

Fort Nelson

Fort Nelson General Hospital

 

Squamish

Squamish General Hospital

Fort St. John

Fort St. John General Hospital
and Health Centre

 

Summerland

Summerland General Hospital

Golden

Golden and District Hospital

 

Surrey

Peace Arch Hospital Wellness Centre

Grand Forks

Boundary Hospital

 

Surrey

Surrey Memorial Hospital

Hazelton

Wrinch Memorial Hospital

 

Terrace

Mills Memorial Hospital

Invermere

Invermere and District Hospital

 

Trail

Trail Regional Hospital

Kamloops

Royal Inland Hospital

 

Vancouver

BC's Children's Hospital

Kelowna

Kelowna General Hospital

 

Vancouver

BC's Women's Hospital and Health Centre

Keremeos

Keremeos Diagnostic and Treatment Centre

 

Vancouver

Chinese Community Diabetic Education Society

Kimberley

Kimberley and District Hospital

 

Vancouver

G.F. Strong Centre

Kitimat

Kitimat General Hospital

 

Vancouver

Mount St. Joseph Hospital

Langley

Langley Memorial Hospital

 

Vancouver

St. Paul's Hospital

Lillooet

Lillooet District Hospital

 

Vancouver

Vancouver General Hospital

Vanderhoof

St. John Hospital

Maple Ridge

Ridge Meadows Hospital

 

Vernon

Vernon Jubilee Hospital

Merritt

Nicola Valley General Hospital

 

Victoria

Royal Jubilee Hospital

Mission

Mission Memorial Hospital

 

Victoria

Victoria General Hospital

Nakusp

Arrow Lakes Hospital

 

Williams Lake

Cariboo Memorial Hospital

Nanaimo

Nanaimo Regional General Hospital

 

White Rock

Peach Arch Hospital Wellness Centre

Table 5. Statistical analysis comparing Bella Coola Clinic and UBC Clinic.

  Bella Coola
diabetics
Vancouver
diabetics
P value

Gender
Male
Female

55.3%
44.7%
55.7%
44.3%
0.96

Mean age

59.24 ± 11.33 64.52 ± 13.13 0.006

HgAIc in last 6 months

65.9% 88.6% 0.0006

Mean HgAIc

0.0764 ± 0.020 0.0793 ± 0.018 0.33

HgAIc values (categories)
<0.06
0.061 - 0.070
0.071 - 0.080
0.080

23.5
24.7
20.0
31.8
5.1
36.7
24.1
34.2
0.0079

On insulin

15.3% 12.7% 0.63

On oral hypoglycemics

69.4% 83.5% 0.034

Received diabetic education

90.6% 70.9% 0.0013

Received consultation

47.1% 69.6% 0.0035

References

1. Thommasen HV, Grzybowski S, Sun R. Physician to population ratios in British Columbia. Can J Rural Med 1999;4:139-145. Full Text
2. BC Stats. 1996 British Columbia Census. Victoria, BC: Government of British Columbia.
3. Thommasen HV, Newbery P, Watt WD. Medical history of central coast of British Columbia. BC Med J 1999;41:464-470. 
4. Marshall R. Health report: Fit for life. Maclean’s 23 Oct 2000:20-32. Full Text
5. British Columbia Provincial Health Officer. A Report on the Health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officer’s Annual Report 1996. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, 1997.
6. Thommasen HV, Berkowitz J, Grzybowski S. Community factors associated with long-term physician retention. BC Med J 2000;42:426-429. Full Text
7. Thommasen HV. Physician retention and recruitment outside urban British Columbia. BC Med J 2000;42:304-308. Full Text
8. Thommasen HV, Thommasen AT. General practitioner-to-population ratios and long-term family physician retention in British Columbia’s health regions. Can J Rural Med 2001;6:115-122. Full Text
9. Foster LT, Macdonald J, Tuk TA, et al. Native health in British Columbia: A vital statistics perspective. In: A Persistent Spirit: Towards Understanding Aboriginal Health in British Columbia. Stephenson PH, Elliott SJ, Foster LT, et al., eds. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria (Western Geographical Press), 1995:43-94. Canadian Western Geographical Series, Volume 31.
10. British Columbia Division of Vital Statistics (BCDVS). Status Indians in British Columbia, 1989. A Vital Statistics Overview. In: Division of Vital Statistics Quarterly Digest. 1 (1&2). Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Health, 1989:20-25.
11. British Columbia Division of Vital Statistics (BCDVS). Analysis of Status Indians in British Columbia: A Vital Statistical Overview (1987–1992). Interim Report. Division of Vital Statistics Feature Report, 25 January 1994. 44 pp.
12. Smylie J. Aboriginal Health Issues Committee. A guide for health professionals working with aboriginal peoples: Health issues affecting aboriginal peoples. Journal SOGC 2001;100:54-68. Full Text
13. MacMillan HL, MacMillan AB, Offord DR, et al. Aboriginal health. CMAJ 1996;155:1569-1578. PubMed Abstract
14. Young TK. The Health of Native Americans: Toward a Biocultural Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 1994. 265 pp.
15. British Columbia. Provincial Health Officer. A Report on the Health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officer’s Annual Report 1999. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, 2000. 184 pp. Full Text
16. Expert Committee of the Canadian Advisory Board. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. CMAJ 1998;159(suppl 8):S1-S29. PubMed Abstract Full Text
17. Harris MI. Diabetes in America: Epidemiology and scope of the problem. Diabetes Care 1998;21(suppl 3):C11-14. PubMed Abstract
18. Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al., eds. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. NIH Publication No. 95-1468. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1995. Full Text
19. Wilson PW, Cupples LA, Kannel WB. Is hyperglycemia associated with cardiovascular disease? Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1991;121:586-590. PubMed Abstract
20. Haffner SM. Patients with type 2 diabetes: The case for primary prevention. Am J Med 1999;107:43S-45S. PubMed Abstract
21. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986. PubMed Abstract Full Text
22. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylurea or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type II diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-853. PubMed Abstract
23. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405-412. PubMed Abstract Full Text
24. American Diabetes Association. Clinical Practice Recommendations 2001. Diabetes Care. January 2001;24: S80-S82.
25. Vaaler S. Optimal glycemic control in type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2000;23(suppl 2):B30-B34. PubMed Abstract Full Text
26. Brown SA, Upchurch S, Anding R, et al. Promoting weight loss in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1996;19:613-621. PubMed Abstract
27. Pan X, Li G, Hu Y, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 1997;20:537-544. PubMed Abstract
28. Schneider SH. Ten year experience with an exercise-based outpatient life-style modification program in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1800-1810. PubMed Abstract
29. Hu F, Stampfer MJ, Solomon C, et al. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular events in diabetic women. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:96-105. PubMed Abstract Full Text
30. Berger M, Jorgens V, Muhlhauser I. Rationale for the use of insulin therapy alone as the pharmacological treatment of type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22(suppl 3):C71-C75. PubMed Abstract Full Text
31. Lindstrom T. Sustained improvement of glycemic control by insulin treatment after 9 years in patients with type 2 diabetes and secondary failure. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1373-1374. PubMed Citation Full Text
32. Ilkova H, Glaser B, Tunckale A, et al. Induction of long term glycemic control in newly diagnosed type II diabetic patients by transient intensive insulin treatment. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1353-1356. PubMed Abstract
33. Abraira C, Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in Type II Diabetes (VACSDM). Diabetes Care 1995;18:1113-23. PubMed Abstract
34. Thompson DM. Diabetes. BC Med J 1997;39:76.
35. Tildesley H. Diabetes teaching centres in BC. BC Med J 1997;39:77-79. 

 


Marcos Gobrial, MD, CCFP, Hany Mekael, MD, CCFP, Nancy Anderson, MD, CCFP, Dieter Ayers, MSc, and Harvey V. Thommasen, MD, CCFP

Drs Gobrial and Mekael were family practice residents in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia and are currently medical officers in the Canadian Forces. Dr Anderson is an assistant clinical professor in the Department of Family Practice at UBC. Mr Ayers is a statistical consultant at the University of Northern British Columbia. Dr Thommasen is professor and chair of Community Health in the Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC.

Marcos Gobrial, MD, CCFP, Hany Mekael, MD, CCFP, Nancy Anderson, MD, CCFP, Dieter Ayers, MSc, Harvey Thommasen, MD, MSc, FCFP. Diabetic blood sugar control: An urban/rural comparison. BCMJ, Vol. 44, No. 10, December, 2002, Page(s) 537-543 - Clinical Articles.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply