Mid-foot pain: Is it a Lisfranc injury?

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 57, No. 9, November 2015, Page 401 WorkSafeBC

Injuries to the tarsometatarsal joints of the foot, also known as the Lisfranc joint, are common workplace injuries, yet they are often difficult to detect. The cause of these injuries can be as innocuous as missing a step or as severe as a motor vehicle incident. Minor degrees of injury might sprain the joint, while more serious injuries may sublux or dislocate the joint, and may be associated with a fracture. In order to avoid being misdiagnosed, patients suspected of having such an injury require thoughtful and precise clinical examination.

During the past 20 years WorkSafeBC has seen approximately 220 claims from workers with this potentially devastating injury. More than 85% of these workers were male, with a mean age of 40. Recovery from these injuries is often long and complex. On average, workers with such injuries spent 222 calendar days away from work and almost 65% were left with a functional impairment and received a long-term disability award.

Anatomy of the joint
The Lisfranc joint is another name for the tarsometatarsal joints of the foot. This includes the first and second tarsometatarsal joints, which are most commonly involved in Lisfranc injuries. The first metatarsal is the larger of the two but the second, more important bone forms the keystone of the transmetatarsal arch and is wedged more proximally to articulate with the middle cuneiform bone. The function of the Lisfranc joint is to transfer stress from forefoot to mid-foot.

The bone anatomy of the Lisfranc joint is extremely stable, with strong ligaments securing the region. When an abnormal load of low- or high-energy activities impacts the joint, destabilization can occur.

Diagnosing Lisfranc injuries
In seemingly low-energy injuries Lisfranc abnormalities may be underdiagnosed. Patients may complain of mid-foot pain and exhibit subtle swelling but may produce normal X-rays. Diabetics in particular may complain of very little or no pain. Primary care providers must keep a possible Lisfranc diagnosis in mind whenever a patient complains of mid-foot pain after an injury.

Lisfranc injuries can also be underdiagnosed in high-energy injuries, especially when the patient has multiple injuries and may not receive a foot examination. All patients with multiple injuries require a secondary and tertiary survey, which includes palpation of the Lisfranc joint.

A CT scan is an extremely useful tool to diagnose subtle Lisfranc injuries. While a bone scan is a reasonable option in lieu of an easily available CT, false negatives can occur if the bone scan is done too soon after an injury.

Treating Lisfranc injuries
Patients with proven or suspected Lisfranc injuries with no bone displacement may be treated in a removable boot and allowed to weight-bear on the heel while on crutches for the balance of a 6-week recovery. They may then progress to full weight-bearing in the boot for another 6 weeks. At 10 to 12 weeks postinjury they may transition to a regular shoe.

All patients with a displaced Lisfranc injury need orthopaedic referral and will likely require surgery to stabilize the region. Surgical exceptions might only include diabetics with a Charcot arthropathy involving the Lisfranc joint.

Despite surgery Lisfranc patients will typically have chronic pain in their mid-foot and possibly require special orthotics and footwear adjustments. In some cases they will require further surgery to fuse the mid-foot.

Further information
If you require further information or assistance regarding a patient with a suspected work-related Lisfranc injury, please contact a medical advisor in your nearest WorkSafeBC office.
—Alan Baggoo, MD, FRCSC
WorkSafeBC Visiting Specialist, Orthopedic Surgery


This article is the opinion of WorkSafeBC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.

Alan Baggoo, MD, FRCSC,. Mid-foot pain: Is it a Lisfranc injury?. BCMJ, Vol. 57, No. 9, November, 2015, Page(s) 401 - WorkSafeBC.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply