Achilles tendon ruptures—a review for primary care

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 58, No. 9, November 2016, Pages 520-521 WorkSafeBC

The Achilles tendon is the most commonly ruptured tendon and the incidence is increasing.[1,2,3] Unfortunately, 20% to 25% of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are misdiagnosed initially.[1,4] Diagnosis is based on history and physical examination. Use of MRI or ultrasound is not indicated unless there are equivocal physical exam findings.

Common mechanisms include pushing off with the weight-bearing foot while extending the knee; a sudden, unexpected dorsiflexion of the ankle; or violent ankle dorsiflexion of a plantar flexed foot.[1] Patients often describe feeling as if they were kicked in the back of the ankle. Some will have minimal discomfort and may be weight-bearing. They may describe a “pop” at the time of injury. Fluoroquinolone or steroid use, diabetes, or chronic renal failure can increase the risk of rupture but make small contributions to overall incidence.[5,6]

The Thompson test is considered to be the most accurate—it is positive in 96% to 100% of acute ruptures.[7,8,9] Other physical findings include a palpable tendon gap, tenderness, and possibly swelling/bruising depending on injury acuity. In the prone position with the patient’s feet off the examining table, the injured foot will hang in more dorsiflexion than the contralateral foot. The patient may be able to plantarflex and the Thompson test may result in some movement, but in both cases the injured side will be weaker and decreased compared with the uninjured side. This is due to other musculotendinous structures that pass the ankle posteriorly.


Treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures is currently undergoing transition. Traditional treatment involves 12 weeks of immobilization. If treated surgically, the tendon is repaired and the foot immobilized in equinus. Immobilization could be splinting followed by casting at 2 weeks, or, more recently, a cast boot with heel wedges. If treated conservatively, the foot is immobilized in equinus. Both approaches are non-weight-bearing and the foot is incrementally brought up to a neutral position over approximately 6 weeks by recasting or removing the heel. The second 6 weeks have the foot immobilized at 90 degrees. Some surgeons may opt to allow protected weight-bearing at this point. If the injury is identified and treatment started within 14 days, the primary difference between the options is higher re-rupture rates with conservative management (meta-analyses found this to be approximately 3% vs 13%)[10,11] vs the risks of surgery. Some surgeons believe surgical repair has better functional outcomes, but this has not been conclusively demonstrated.

A multicentre study in 2010 using an accelerated functional rehabilitation protocol changed the landscape.[3] It found no clinically significant differences in outcome or re-rupture rates. This protocol involved limited immobilization with early motion. The original protocol (see Table)[3] has since been slightly modified by various surgeons. This approach is currently used by a significant number of orthopaedic surgeons in BC. Other studies have validated the results of this approach.[12,13,14,15] There may be an advantage of earlier return to work with surgical intervention.[12] Surgical treatment remains the primary option for patients in whom treatment is begun more than 14 days after injury.

Acute Achilles ruptures are most common in male weekend warriors. Diagnosis is made with history and physical examination. Treatment can be conservative or surgical, with accelerated function rehabilitation offering conservative management the advantages of surgery without the risks. The conservative approach can be used only if treatment is initiated within 14 days of injury. A patient diagnosed with acute Achilles rupture should be immediately made non-weight-bearing, immobilized in equinus, and referred to the local orthopaedic surgeon on call. This will allow all treatment options to be available to the patient and treating surgeon.
—Derek Smith, MD, FRCSC
WorkSafeBC Orthopaedic Specialist Advisor


This article is the opinion of WorkSafeBC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    Uquillas CA, Guss MS, Ryan DJ, et al. Everything Achilles: Knowledge update and current concepts in management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:1187-1195.

2.    Guss D, Smith JT, Chiodo CP. Acute Achilles tendon rupture: A critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2015;3:e2.

3.    Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2767-2775.

4.    Cooper MT. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: Does surgery offer superior results (and other confusing issues)? Clin Sports Med 2015;34:595-606.

5.    Raikin SM, Garras DN, Krapchev PV. Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:475-480.

6.    Sode J, Obel N, Hallas J, Lassen A. Use of fluroquinolone and risk of Achilles tendon rupture: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:499-503.

7.    Thompson TC, Doherty JH. Spontaneous rupture of tendon of Achilles: A new clinical diagnostic test. J Trauma 1962;2:126-129.

8.    O’Brien T. The needle test for complete rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1099-1101.

9.    Inglis AE, Sculco TP. Surgical repair of ruptures of the tendo Achillis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;(156):160-169.

10.    Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, et al. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A systematic overview and metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(400):190-200.

11.    Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, et al. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2202-2210.

12.    Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:2136-2143.

13.    Jones MP, Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL. Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon rupture: Key findings from a recent Cochrane review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:e88.

14.    Olsson N, Silbernagel KG, Eriksson BI, et al. Stable surgical repair with accelerated rehabilitation versus nonsurgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:2867-2876.

15.    Keating JF, Will EM. Operative versus non-operative treatment of acute rupture of tendo Achillis: A prospective randomised evaluation of functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1071-1078.

Derek Smith, MD, FRCSC. Achilles tendon ruptures—a review for primary care. BCMJ, Vol. 58, No. 9, November, 2016, Page(s) 520-521 - WorkSafeBC.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply