Workers Compensation Act amended to include COVID-19

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 63, No. 5, June 2021, Page 207 WorkSafeBC COVID-19

To be compensable under the Workers Compensation Act, an occupational disease must be due to the nature of any employment in which the worker was employed (the work causation requirement). There are two general approaches to establishing work causation: where a presumption applies and where one does not.

Where a presumption applies, the starting point is that work causation is presumed. This means that a claim can be accepted even though no specific evidence of work causation is produced. However, the presumption is rebutted if the evidence shows the occupational disease was not due to the worker’s employment.

Where no presumption applies, WorkSafeBC must determine whether the evidence in the specific case shows the occupational disease is due to the worker’s employment. In making this determination, WorkSafeBC decision-makers apply guidance found in WorkSafeBC’s Contagious Diseases policy.[1]

Schedule 1 presumption

On 20 August 2020, Schedule 1 of the Act was amended to add a work causation presumption for infections caused by communicable viral pathogens, including COVID-19. The presumption refers to infections caused by communicable viral pathogens, rather than COVID-19 specifically, to ensure it will apply to similar infections that may arise in the future. At this time, BC is the only Canadian workers’ compensation jurisdiction with presumptive legislation for COVID-19 infections. (Newfoundland does not have a specific COVID-19 presumption, but it does have a more general presumption for infectious diseases “contracted in an occupation where there is a particular risk of contamination,” which could apply to COVID-19.)

The presumption requires the infections to be subject to a BC-specific emergency declaration or notice under the BC Public Health Act, BC Emergency Program Act, or Vancouver Charter. Limiting the presumption in this way ensures it applies only in exceptional circumstances. Other common outbreaks (e.g., the common cold) continue to be adjudicated on a case-by-case basis using existing law and policy.

Under this presumption, work causation is presumed (unless the contrary is proved) if both:

  • The worker’s employment involves a risk of exposure to source(s) of infection significantly greater than the public at large.
  • The exposure risk occurs during the time period and within the geographical area of the BC-specific emergency or notice.

The second requirement further ensures the presumption applies only in exceptional circumstances.

COVID-19 claims statistics

As of 19 March 2021, 4314 claims have been submitted to WorkSafeBC related to a workplace COVID-19 exposure. Of the COVID-19 claims that proceeded to an allow/disallow decision, 71% have been allowed to date. (Not all claims registered receive an allow or disallow decision; some are suspended when insufficient information is available or a worker decides not to proceed.) If exposure-only claims—those where the worker was potentially exposed, tested, and/or required to self-isolate, but didn’t develop the illness, as confirmed with a negative test result or absence of symptoms—are excluded from the disallowed claims, then the allow rate is approximately 95%. This better represents the allow rate on claims where the worker developed COVID-19.

Currently, the majority of COVID-19 claims are from workers in the health care, social services, and education subsectors (e.g., acute care, long-term care, and public school districts).
—Michelle Vukelic
Research Analyst, WorkSafeBC

Further information


This article is the opinion of WorkSafeBC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    WorkSafeBC. Rehabilitation services and claims manual, volume II. Accessed 20 April 2021.

Michelle Vukelic. Workers Compensation Act amended to include COVID-19. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 5, June, 2021, Page(s) 207 - WorkSafeBC, COVID-19.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply