|Dr Joshua Greggain|
Undoubtedly, we have all had “where were you” moments when life-changing and historical events happened. I remember exactly where I was when Princess Diana died, and when Mother Teresa passed 6 days later. I recall, in vivid detail, the unbelievable events of 11 September 2001, and more recently when news broke about finding the remains of 215 Indigenous children on the grounds of the Kamloops residential school.
This one hit closer to home. It was 27 May 2021, and it was a moment that carried so many levels of devastation: the initial shock, and then comprehending how something like this could happen in Canada; the sadness that for years these stories went untold; and the personal connection that this discovery lay within a community I knew. This was a place where some of my patients had been students, and others were relatives of these children. This was more than just a heartbreaking national news story; this was personal. It weighed heavily on my heart then and continues to do so today.
For 12 years, I had the privilege of working alongside the Boston Bar First Nation in an Indigenous-led primary care clinic about 200 km from Kamloops. During that time, I heard stories, understood truths, and learned teachings from my Indigenous patients that will forever hold space my heart. I thought I understood many of my patients’ stories—the impact of generational trauma and the subsequent health consequences. I tried to practise what Maya Angelou articulated: “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” And with the discovery of those children and the thousands since, I knew I could do better. I believe we all can.
I have tried to change my interactions and my questions in my clinical practice to acknowledge the truths of what I now know and understand. I appreciate that without speaking truth there will not be reconciliation. That we as a profession need to acknowledge the truths of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s reports and the In Plain Sight report to reconcile our country, reconcile our communities, and reconcile with our patients. I didn’t attend a residential school, but that doesn’t mean I can’t do better than those before me who looked like me, who shared my heritage, or who shared a faith or belief system. I can do better. It starts with changing the language I use from asking “What is wrong?” to asking “What happened?” From asking “Where are you from?” to saying “Tell me about your community and who your relatives are.” It is an ongoing learning process, and every day I try to do better. I will continue to seek humility before truth and understand that truth needs to come before reconciliation.
The 30th of September is the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, also known as Orange Shirt Day, an Indigenous-led grassroots commemorative day intended to raise awareness about the individual, family, and community intergenerational impacts of residential schools. It promotes the tenet “Every child matters.” The orange shirt symbolizes the stripping away of culture, freedom, and self-esteem that Indigenous children experienced across generations.
I will wear my orange shirt and attend a local event to commemorate the day. I encourage you to do the same. I ask you to consider reviewing the health-related Calls to Action (#18–#24) from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada [Box], whether for the first time or the hundredth. More than anything else, I ask you to consider how we, individually and as a medical culture and community, can seek humility, because I believe that if we can reveal our collective humility, we can find a path to the truth. It is only then that we can move forward toward reconciliation.
—Joshua Greggain, MD
Doctors of BC President
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.|
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org