The fascinating thing about the field of medicine, and about working a lifetime as a physician, is the speed at which knowledge and practice change.
The fascinating thing about the field of medicine, and about working a lifetime as a physician, is the speed at which knowledge and practice change. Much of what I learned in medical school is now considered outdated, and clinical practice is continually evolving. As we learn more, keeping up to date can be overwhelming, but learning provides us with many opportunities. By learning from others, learning through experiences, and learning through our partnerships, we have the chance to see the world of medicine and our profession through many different lenses.
From birth, throughout childhood and adolescence, and into adult life, the challenges we face and the experiences we have profoundly influence the person we become—and establish the lens with which we view the world. I recently attended an Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) workshop, put on by Doctors of BC’s Shared Care Committee. It was exciting and extremely interactive, with participation from clinicians, health authorities, the Ministry of Health, and patients. All of us attending brought our past experiences, which have impacted our view of the world. The key lesson I took home from this workshop was that enquiring about ACEs should be a part of the patient histories I take in my practice—that sharing these experiences is the first step to healing, and merely asking the question changes outcomes for patients. It also provides me with the opportunity to view things through my patients’ lenses.
A goal of workshops such as this is to bring together pentagram partners—all of us who view health care through a different lens—and have us share our learnings and our experiences. The ACEs workshop I attended specifically looked at the programs and ongoing work taking place in Alberta and considered how these concepts could be incorporated into primary and maternity care in BC—how our profession and our patients could benefit from Alberta’s experiences. It addressed how Alberta’s work included folks across multiple sectors, including government ministries, that do not typically work together; how Alberta incorporated not only patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives and experiences but also the perspectives of educators, policymakers, administrators, and politicians; and how Alberta looked through many different lenses to see the whole picture—partnerships that are critical to developing programs that work.
Why does this matter in BC? Because as we develop the practical aspects of patient medical homes and primary care homes we must look at this work through the lenses of all those across the continuum of care. It’s important for our patients, it’s important for us as physicians, and it’s important to our partners. Partnerships have the potential to strengthen and enrich our advocacy and policy work. And building relationships will ultimately increase our ability to work together toward common goals. But only when we view this work through each other’s lenses will we be successful in uniting and aligning our work. One example is our partnership with the First Nations Health Authority (FNHA). Indigenous people are particularly affected by ACEs, and through meeting with leaders from the FNHA I have seen their challenges through a different lens. We as clinicians have a particular perspective, formed and modified through our medical training.
Sometimes the people we work with come from such a different place that we need to radically shift our assumptions and our viewpoint to find common ground to begin the discussion. We need to look at the world through their lens.
Medicine is changing. We are changing. And each experience—good or bad—changes the lens through which we view the world. As individuals and as a profession, we have the opportunity to see the world through other lenses, and as we move forward as an organization we must consider these other lenses as we develop our overall vision.
During my year as president I want you to share your views with me so I can understand your concerns, develop relationships with you, and build connections with other organizations on your behalf. I encourage you to e-mail me at email@example.com and share your stories. Help me see the world through your lens.
—Trina Larsen Soles, MD
Doctors of BC President
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org