How crisis can be an impetus for positive change

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 64, No. 5, June 2022, Page 200 President's Comment
Dr Ramneek Dosanjh
Dr Ramneek Dosanjh

The challenges we face as a profession are immense. The challenges within our health care system are daunting. There is no sugarcoating it. The health care system is in crisis. We are a profession in crisis. The current sentiment throughout our profession appears to be one of anger. Despite our relentless efforts, advances, and innovations, there are parts of our broken health care system that need a desperate overhaul, which is inciting anger. Anger is a common expressed secondary emotion but can have underlying rooted origins in fear, resentment, frustration, or sadness. Lately, it seems that our amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex are in overdrive in medicine. One thing is for certain: our outpouring of emotions on display is reflective of what is intolerable.

Frustration that has been building, especially during the pandemic, has morphed into outright anger. And when we are angry, we lash out—at the government, at the professional associations we feel should be doing a better job of representing us, and sometimes at each other.

Anger has its place. It can be a constructive force, a catalyst to bring about needed changes. The tremendous outpouring of anger from the public toward government with respect to the shortage of family doctors, for example, is creating a pivotal opportunity to make real change. So is the fact that many doctors are closing their offices in response to the broken system and suboptimal conditions.

If we are truly invested in the future of our profession, it is up to us to use this as fuel to create our revival. It has been years of disparities, inequities, unmet needs, and short-term bandage solutions that got us here. If we want to advance our health care system, improve our morbidity and mortality rates, and provide preventive care and medicine indicative of the 21st century, now is the time to use our anguish. No longer will we settle for substandard care or outcomes, no longer will we be divided or pushed into inequities, and no longer will we accept the status quo.

Doctors of BC is committed to doing the right thing when times are tough; through adversity and uncertainty, we will continue to strive, as we are better together. We support all our members to be able to provide the care they wish to deliver. For example, within the current primary care crisis, we are strongly fighting for the things we need to attract and retain family doctors, so that our doctors can be supported to provide the care our patients need and deserve.

We are pressing on the need for quick action on many fronts: for new and expanded contract models that will address the rising costs of doing business and the additional time and energy required to provide longitudinal patient care, and for steps to relieve physician burdens so that we can relieve ourselves of administrative burdens and spend more time doing what we love—providing patient care.

To this extent, we want to see more and better support for after-hours care, more support for locums, and an easing of administrative burdens. We recognize the need for and deserve a healthy and safe working environment, and we are pressing on the government to approach this with urgency and an understanding of the need to act promptly.

This is just one example of how we are advocating for you. Many colleagues outside of primary care are facing critical challenges as well. The long wait times for surgery in our province are unacceptable. All doctors, irrespective of their expertise or geographical location in the province, need to have a voice and real influence in health authority decision making. Physicians have valuable frontline experience and understanding and should play a pivotal role in formulating solutions. Doctors of BC continues to advocate strongly on these fronts—directly with government and health authorities—and by supporting medical staff associations and empowering them in their relationships with health authorities. The same is true for family doctors who are empowered by divisions of family practice at the grassroots level. Many don’t realize that the divisions are funded by Doctors of BC and the BC government, as part of the Physician Master Agreement.

We are also advocating for you in other areas that you have told us are priorities for you through surveys; through your divisions, medical staff associations, and the Joint Collaborative Committees; and through engagement with Doctors of BC. We are listening to all of you, who are also passionate about social determinants of health—considering the impacts of poverty, inequality, discrimination, climate change, and other factors on health outcomes, particularly for our children. We are actively advocating with the public, the media, and key stakeholder partners. A working group through the Council on Health Economics and Policy is working on a policy statement on gender equity that will be coming to the Board later this year, part of our commitment to address equity, diversity, and cultural safety/humility.

We are fierce in our advocacy for you and your patients. We are doing this on many different fronts. Let’s use our anger to seek solutions together and promote change. We all have a role to play in navigating the challenging terrain ahead of us. We can no longer be silent; our voices will not be muffled, for what we speak of and stand for is the betterment of all our patients and British Columbians. When we mobilize together and act as one, we have our biggest opportunity to make positive change. We must seize the moment, together, now.
—Ramneek Dosanjh, MD
Doctors of BC President


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Ramneek Dosanjh, MD. How crisis can be an impetus for positive change. BCMJ, Vol. 64, No. 5, June, 2022, Page(s) 200 - President's Comment.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply