A call for policy change: Funding fertility treatments for medical trainees

Medical trainees experience disproportionately high rates of infertility, driven in part by training-related delays in childbearing, and face significant financial and institutional barriers to accessing fertility care, highlighting the need for equitable, standardized policies and insurance coverage for fertility preservation and treatment across Canada.


Medical trainees make countless sacrifices in pursuit of their careers: weekends, holidays, sleep, and often their own well-being. Are they also sacrificing their ability to achieve their long-term family goals? For women in particular, the answer is often yes. Fertility is strongly age dependent, with a well-recognized steep decline after age 35.[1] Between 2020 and 2024, the average age of female medical school graduates in Canada was 27.3 years.[2] These years of training coincide with their peak reproductive years.

The impact of infertility, however, is not isolated to women. In 2023, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine expanded its definition of infertility to include not only medical inability to conceive but also social infertility. Social infertility includes individuals in same-sex relationships, single parents by choice, and individuals who have undergone gender-affirming medical or surgical care.[3] This broader definition more accurately reflects the growing diversity of individuals seeking assistance with family building.

Fertility care extends beyond treatment of infertility and must be reflected in equitable coverage policies, including elective oocyte cryopreservation. This approach allows trainees to preserve reproductive potential during training and supports a preventive model of care. Elective oocyte cryopreservation mitigates age-related decline in oocyte quality, with the goal of reducing the need for more invasive and costly interventions in the future.

Infertility among physicians is consistently reported at more than double the rate of the general population (24% to 33% versus 12%).[4] Female surgical trainees are especially affected, with one study showing that 84% of female surgeons underwent infertility evaluation and 76% ultimately required assisted reproductive technology to conceive.[5] Physicians—residents in particular—are also at higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including elevated rates of preterm delivery, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth.[6,7] Miller and colleagues have even suggested that residents should be considered a high-risk obstetric population.[6]

The University of Calgary’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology recently surveyed surgical trainees across Alberta. Nearly 85% were childless, yet 82% desired two or more children in the future.[8] Consistent with Canadian and international data, the majority planned to delay childbearing well into their 30s due to career demands, financial barriers, and limited institutional support.[8] Strikingly, many trainees underestimated the impact of age-related fertility decline while overestimating the success rates of assisted reproductive technology.[8] In fact, studies estimate that a couple desiring two children should begin attempting to conceive when the female partner is age 27 at the oldest for a 90% chance of success without intervention.[9] Despite this, the average age of first-time mothers in Canada was 31.7 years in 2023.[10]

Among trainees who sought fertility support during training, access was often limited by a lack of policies and program standards. In British Columbia, the current resident contract includes no specific provisions for fertility-related care, in contrast to the clearer leave structures for prenatal care.[11,12] This disparity leaves trainees who require fertility supports at an even greater disadvantage to meeting their family goals than their peers who conceive without assistance.

Medical trainees dedicate their time and energy to caring for patients, and they deserve comparable support in achieving their family-building goals. Trainees earn incomes that are comparable to, or only modestly above, the median individual income in Canada and British Columbia, with most carrying substantial educational debt.[13] In Canada, a single cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF) costs approximately $18 000 to $25 000, including medications and embryo transfer.[14] Oocyte cryopreservation is similarly expensive, at approximately $15 000 to $20 000 per cycle.[14] This leaves fertility treatment largely inaccessible to trainees without insurance coverage.

Beyond financial considerations, access to fertility care is logistically challenging for trainees. Treatment requires frequent appointments for cycle monitoring, egg retrievals, and embryo transfers, as well as recovery time, necessitating time away from clinical duties. In the absence of standardized policies and program support, trainees may face major scheduling difficulties, limiting access to care.

Nearly 83% of surgical trainees in Alberta reported that they would consider oocyte cryopreservation or infertility treatment if insurance coverage were available.[8] Other studies echo this finding, with almost 40% of medical students indicating that fertility benefits would influence their choice of residency program.[8,15-17] Given the substantial physician shortage in British Columbia, the inclusion of fertility benefits represents a meaningful incentive to attract and retain trainees.[18]

This issue is not isolated to BC. Across Canada, fertility coverage remains inconsistent, with most medical trainee programs offering little or no fertility support. Ontario and Nova Scotia provide some trainee-specific benefits: members of the Professional Association of Residents of Ontario receive full coverage for fertility medications, while Maritime Resident Doctors members are eligible for up to $15 000 in fertility drug coverage.[19-25] These models establish a precedent for expanding trainee-specific fertility benefits across Canada and support a broader adoption of similar benefits.

At the provincial level, funding models also vary widely. Ontario and Quebec both fund one cycle of IVF and unlimited coverage for intrauterine insemination. Other provinces offer partial funding or reimbursement models: Manitoba and Nova Scotia fund approximately 40% of treatment costs, with a defined annual and lifetime maximum, while Saskatchewan funds 50% of coverage up to a lifetime maximum. Prince Edward Island offers income-based reimbursement up to $10 000 annually, and Newfoundland and Labrador provides up to $20 000 in lifetime funding. New Brunswick offers a one-time grant of up to $20 000 for IVF or $10 000 for intrauterine insemination, while Yukon provides a tax credit covering 40% of treatment costs up to $10 000 annually. In contrast, Alberta, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories currently provide no public funding.[26]

The recent introduction of a publicly funded IVF program in British Columbia, which covers one funded cycle for eligible applicants, emphasizes the growing recognition of fertility care as a public health priority. However, this program is currently structured as a temporary initiative and includes eligibility criteria such as age (18–41 years) and household income below $250 000.[27] While most trainees meet these eligibility criteria, access remains limited due to the timing and structure of treatment during medical training. Coverage is also restricted to individuals actively attempting conception, excluding fertility preservation strategies.[27] Further, demand for such services far exceeds the current budget provisions, and without supplemental insurance coverage, fertility treatment remains unattainable for most trainees.

Pacific Blue Cross, the insurance provider for BC medical trainees, has promoted its commitment to family planning, partnering with the BC Women’s Health Foundation to launch a new plan that expanded family planning benefits.[28] Yet, this is not the plan offered to residents. The current Resident Doctors of BC contract explicitly excludes fertility drugs and treatments, aside from a $500 annual health savings account.[11]

Over the past 3 decades, female representation in medicine has increased by 27%, with women now comprising more than half of medical graduates.[2] Canada is also home to 1.3 million individuals who identify as part of the 2SLGBTQ+ community (4.4% of the population), more than 40% of whom desire children.[29] Without fertility coverage, many of these individuals sacrifice their reproductive goals to pursue medical training. The consequences extend beyond personal hardship—ultimately influencing specialty choice, exacerbating physician shortages, and increasing the burden of high-risk pregnancies on the health care system.

Fertility preservation and treatment must be recognized as essential components of reproductive health, alongside prenatal care and parental leave. Provincial and national standards are urgently needed to ensure equitable, transparent, and consistent access for trainees. By addressing these barriers through education, counseling, and insurance coverage, we can support the health and wellness of future physicians. In doing so, we allow trainees to pursue both their professional and personal aspirations, ultimately strengthening the medical workforce and the communities it serves.

Competing interests

Dr Mazza has no competing interests to declare. Dr Tallon is the medical director of Olive Fertility Centre Victoria and co-director of Olive Fertility Centre Vancouver.

Artificial intelligence

The authors used an artificial intelligence–based language tool to assist with reference formatting. All content was reviewed and verified by the authors.

hidden


This article has been peer reviewed.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


References

1.    Liu KE, Case A. No. 346–Advanced reproductive age and fertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2017;39:685-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.004.

2.    Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Data: Canadian medical education statistics (CMES). Accessed 27 August 2025. www.afmc.ca/resources-data/data/canadian-medical-education-statistics-cmes/.

3.    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definition of infertility: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2023;120:1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(23)01971-4.

4.    Kassab JG, Garcia Keeme-Sayre A, Lipshultz LI. Physician infertility: A structured literature review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024;41:2227-2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03216-4.

5.    Lai K, Garvey EM, Velazco CS, et al. High infertility rates and pregnancy complications in female physicians indicate a need for culture change. Ann Surg 2023;277:367-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005724.

6.    Phillips EA, Nimeh T, Braga J, Lerner LB. Does a surgical career affect a woman’s childbearing and fertility? A report on pregnancy and fertility trends among female surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:944-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.936.

7.    Miller NH, Katz VL, Cefalo RC. Pregnancies among physicians: A historical cohort study. J Reprod Med 1989;34:790-796.

8.    Bowden S, Tang S, Metcalfe A, Foong S. Fertility preservation and infertility treatment in female surgical trainees in Alberta: A survey of trainee knowledge, attitudes, and needs. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2025;47:102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102731.

9.    Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Realizing a desired family size: When should couples start? Hum Reprod 2015;30:2215-2221. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev148.

10.    Statistics Canada. Table 13-10-0417-01. Mean age of mother at time of delivery (live births). 25 September 2024. Accessed 27 August 2025. https://doi.org/10.25318/1310041701-eng.

11.    Resident Doctors of BC. Your group benefit plan: For regular full-time and part-time employees covered by the Resident Doctors of BC collective agreement, 2022-2025 (#21). 1 January 2024. Accessed 17 October 2025. https://residentdoctorsbc.app.neoncrm.com/np/viewDocument?orgId=residentdoctorsbc&id=402889b98de91ed7018debf911d7001a.

12.    Bowden S. Fertility care for trainees: The need for national policy and transparent institutional support. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2025;47:103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103030.

13.    Statistics Canada. Table 11-10-0239-01. Income of individuals by age group, gender and income source, Canada, provinces and selected census metropolitan areas. 1 May 2025. Accessed 29 March 2026. https://doi.org/10.25318/1110023901-eng.

14.    Evans M. How much does IVF cost in Canada? Markham Fertility Centre. 17 March 2026. Accessed 29 March 2026. https://markhamfertility.com/blog/how-much-does-ivf-cost-in-canada/.

15.    Matevossian K, Rivelli A, Uhler ML. Fertility knowledge and views on egg freezing and family planning among surgical specialty trainees. AJOG Glob Rep 2022;2:100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100096.

16.    Wo L, Eidelson SA, Zheng C, et al. Coverage of fertility preservation and treatment among surgical trainees in the United States of America. J Surg Educ 2023;80:689-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.02.012.

17.    Bowden S, Panchal M, Pochakom A, et al. Shifting the focus for fertility and reproductive health to medical students: A survey study building on lessons from surgical trainees. Fertil Steril 2025:124:769-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.04.021.

18.    Judd A, Stanton K. 1.2 million British Columbians are currently waiting to see a specialist: Survey. Updated 29 January 2025. Accessed 30 December 2025. https://globalnews.ca/news/10987687/bc-specialist-wait-list-survey/.

19.    Professional Association of Residents of Ontario. 2023-2026 PARO-OTH agreement. 15 July 2025. Accessed 3 May 2026. https://myparo.ca/your-contract/.

20.    Professional Association of Residents of Newfoundland and Labrador. Collective agreement between Her Majesty the Queen in right of Newfoundland represented herein by the Treasury Board; and the Professional Association of Residents of Newfoundland and Labrador (PARNL) representing the residents employed in the hospitals in the province. 10 August 2022. Accessed 17 October 2025. www.gov.nl.ca/exec/tbs/files/PARNL-expires-2024-1.pdf.

21.    Professional Association of Residents and Interns of Manitoba. Collective agreement between Professional Association of Residents and Interns of Manitoba and Shared Health: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027. Accessed 3 May 2026. www.parim.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PARIM-Collective-Agreement-2024-2027.pdf.

22.    Fédération des médecins résidents du Québec. Agreement between the Fédération des médecins résidents du Québec (FMRQ), acting on behalf of Association des médecins résidents de Montréal (AMRM); Association des médecins résidents de Québec (AMReQ); Association des médecins résidents de Sherbrooke (AMReS); Association of Residents of McGill (ARM); and the minister of health. Accessed 17 October 2025. https://membre.fmrq.qc.ca/files/2026-03/Agreement-FMRQ-MSSS-2021-2028-with-highlighted-change-marks.pdf.

23.    Resident Doctors of Saskatchewan. Collective agreement for the period January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2022. 15 January 2022. Accessed 17 October 2025. www.residentdoctorssk.ca/uploads/heroImages/2018-2022-Usask-RDoS-CBA-Final.pdf.

24.    Maritime Resident Doctors. Collective agreement: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027. 5 May 2025. Accessed 17 October 2025. www.maritimeresidentdoctors.ca/starting-residency/working-as-a-resident/collective-agreement.

25.    Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta. Agreement between Alberta Health Services (AHS), the governors of the University of Alberta (UAlberta) and the governors of the University of Calgary (UCalgary) (as one party to the agreement) and the Professional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta (PARA) (as the other party to the agreement): July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2028. Accessed 17 October 2025. www.para-ab.ca/uploads/source/ROM/2024-2028_PARA_Agreement_-_Final_Signed_(1).pdf.

26.    Laura Your Fertility Coach. Publicly funded IVF and IUI programs across Canada. Updated April 2026. Accessed 3 May 2026. https://yourfertilitycoach.ca/2023/04/04/fertility-treatment-public-coverage-across-canada/.

27.    Government of British Columbia. Publicly funded in-vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Updated 31 March 2026. Accessed 3 May 2026. www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/accessing-health-care/publicly-funded-ivf-program.

28.    Pacific Blue Cross. Pacific Blue Cross launches new personal health insurance in partnership with BC Women’s Health Foundation. 9 May 2023. Accessed 27 August 2025. www.pac.bluecross.ca/news-articles/pacific-blue-cross-launches-new-personal-health-insurance-in-partnership-with-bc-women-s-health-foundation/.

29.    Government of Canada. Canada at a glance, 2023: 2SLGBTQ+ population. Modified 4 September 2024. Accessed 30 December 2025. www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-581-x/2023001/sec6-eng.htm.

hidden


Dr Mazza is a postgraduate year-3 resident in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia. Dr Tallon is a reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialist in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at UBC.

Kaitlyn Mazza, MD, Niamh Tallon, MB, BCh, BAO, FRCSC. A call for policy change: Funding fertility treatments for medical trainees. BCMJ, Vol. 68, No. 6, July, August, 2026, Page(s) 199-201 - Premise.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply