Malignant bone tumors in children: It’s hard to miss a zebra

The report by Dhinsa, Mahon, and Strahlen­dorf in the May issue of the BCMJ [2020;62:130–133] regarding the delays in the early recognition of solitary childhood neoplasms such as osteosarcoma troubled me. The marked delays documented by the authors in their review could have been avoided if more attention had been paid to all the symptoms at initial presentation by the first caregiver, as well as there being a thoughtful and complete physical examination of the patient before any investigations.

Too often modern medical practice counsels one to follow established algorithms and test results rather than old-fashioned question-and-answer patient interviews and direct physical examination. Their report only confirms my suspicion. To me, it always seemed that if you knew the right questions to ask then the correct diagnosis was more likely to be pursued. As well, the accurate physical examination of the musculoskeletal system appears to be a lost art.

The clinical suspicion and recognition of an underlying bone neoplasm as an explanation for persistent limb pain in children is not quite as difficult as their article suggests. Before ordering a plethora of imaging studies, a few typical and characteristic symptoms should be recognized, and a thoughtful physical exam completed. Because too often even academic physicians and paramedical personnel miss the key questions, I offer a few of these clues.

First, a differential diagnosis should be established based on any commonly occurring painful regional problems such as muscular injury, chronic insertional tendinitis, tendon rupture, meniscal injury, Osgood-Schlatter disease, stress fracture, bursitis, etc., then a physical examination of the painful limb completed searching for these diagnoses while recalling basic musculoskeletal anatomy.

If a possible malignancy remains a high contender, then consider the following:

  • All children with significant lower limb pain will limp, have difficulty with stairs, and stop running.
  • In the upper extremity, bone pain will inhibit strength and limb use.
  • All bone malignancies demonstrate pain at rest.
  • While this limb pain is always present, at times it may be ignorable.
  • The typical pain is dull, aching, centrally within the limb, and poorly localized. It is not superficial.
  • The limb is not tender and is not restricted in motion.
  • Local redness and heat are never observed.
  • Rest alone does not relieve the limb pain.
  • Simple analgesics do not relieve the pain.
  • A sling or brace or compression bandage is unhelpful.
  • Applying heat, massage, stretching, or transcutaneous stimulation does not help.
  • Evening pain interferes with achieving an easy sleep.
  • Night pain often wakes even a sound sleeper.
  • Morning limb pain is noticed upon waking and rising.
  • A palpable soft tissue mass is a late and ominous sign.

If you pay attention to the clues and follow the details, an early correct diagnostic outcome is likely to be achieved.
—Richard Dewar, MD, FRCSC
Retired Clinical Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital and Alberta Children’s Hospital

This letter was submitted in response to “Sometimes we need to think of zebras: An observational study on delays in the identification of bone tumors in children.”

Richard Dewar, MD, FRCSC. Malignant bone tumors in children: It’s hard to miss a zebra. BCMJ, Vol. 62, No. 7, September, 2020, Page(s) 230 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply