Safe prescribing. College replies (3)

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 58, No. 7, September 2016, Page 363 Letters
By: Gerrard A. Vaughan, MD Heidi M. Oetter, MD

Safe Prescribing of Drugs with Potential for Misuse/Diversion was developed over the past year as an evolution to a previous document entitled Prescribing Principles, which failed to prevent an increasing toll of prescription drug misuse and overdose deaths in this province. The decision to reframe what is essentially the same advice as a standard rather than a guideline was based on what the College saw as a need to provide more authoritative direction to the profession in the context of Dr Perry Kendall’s recent description of BC’s health care emergency of opioid misuse and overdose.

The authors write that the professional standard does not explicitly make an exception for active cancer, palliative, and end-of-life patients. In fact it does, but perhaps greater clarity or emphasis on this point would be helpful when the standard is next reviewed.

The College does not accept that the professional standard in any way fails to account for the welfare of patients with mental illness or contributes to the stigmatization of these patients. A large part of the impetus to provide more authoritative direction for safe prescribing was evidence before the College—that it is often patients with concurrent diagnoses of mental illness or addiction who are the victims of the adverse and sometimes fatal side effects of inappropriate long-term opioid treatment.
—Gerrard A. Vaughan, MD
President, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
—Heidi M. Oetter, MD
Registrar and CEO, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia

Gerrard A. Vaughan, MD, Heidi M. Oetter, MD. Safe prescribing. College replies (3). BCMJ, Vol. 58, No. 7, September, 2016, Page(s) 363 - Letters.


Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply