Screen time: A call for action

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 66, No. 10, December 2024, Page 386 Council on Health Promotion

The next time you are in a public place, look around: chances are you will see a child, teen, or even a toddler looking at a screen. Perhaps their parents are as well. You have likely observed how frequently children walk into your clinic holding a screen in front of their faces. Maybe in your practice you are overwhelmed with the demand to manage an explosion of teens with depression, anxiety, self-harm, poor sleep, or disordered eating. Counseling families about the need for physical activity, sleep hygiene, and interpersonal interactions has become part of medical practice.

Screens are now ubiquitous in daily life, and their negative impact was accelerated during the isolation of the pandemic. However, in contrast to the rapid pandemic response, the crisis of screen time’s negative impact on children is being addressed too slowly. Authorities including the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) and the Office of the Surgeon General are calling for action against the normalization of unregulated social media that are negatively affecting speech development, cognition, social–emotional development, attention, and physical health in young children and teens.

Policy intervention is crucial. Although some opine that it is an individual’s responsibility to formulate a family media plan, the surgeon general reminds us that “parents and their children, trying to figure it out on their own, [are] pitted against some of the best product engineers and most well-resourced companies in the world.”[1]

The CPS reminds us that the safe amount of screen time for children under 2 years of age is 0 hours per day. Any exposure to an activity or substance that has been demonstrated to reduce a child’s ability to think, learn, and communicate should be reacted to urgently.

The surgeon general calls the mental health crisis among young people an emergency. The CPS states: “We are in the midst of a youth mental health crisis that demands meaningful and conscientious mitigation measures.”[2] Research shows that face-to-face interactions among teens have declined sharply since the advent of smartphones. The CMAJ highlights the clear impact of social media in causing an “increase in mental distress, self-injurious behaviour and suicidality among youth; there is a dose–response relationship, and the effects appear to be greatest among girls.”[3]

Social media use exposes youth to cyberbullying and exploitation, including sextortion, negatively affecting self-view and relationships. High social media use and media multitasking are related to chronic sleep deprivation, harming cognitive control, academics, and social–emotional functioning. The rise of smartphones has drastically reduced how much children and teens see each other and talk to each other, which is detrimental—potentially catastrophic—for their well-being.

What can we do?

Start education about the effects of screen time on the brains of infants, children, and youth at prenatal visits, and give it the same importance as discussions about breastfeeding, plans for birth control, vaccines, dental health, and other anticipatory health topics.

Include information, guidelines, and warnings about screen time—specifying that the right amount of screen time before age 2 is 0 hours per day—both with postnatal discharge material and at every public health visit.

Equip parents with knowledge about social, developmental, mental, and physical health effects of screen time, gaming, and social media early and often, and provide accessible and equitable resources on the importance of face-to-face time with others and the importance of media-free times and spaces.

Start educating children and youth early in school with a curriculum on the effects of screen time, social media, and gaming on their brain health, and empower them as their own health advocates.

Support public funding, grants, and innovations for free and low-cost activities and parent coaching in safe public spaces that encourage face-to-face time and development of literacy and social skills.
—Jennifer Balfour, MD, FRCPC
—Aven Poynter, MD, FRCPC
Members, Council on Health Promotion

hidden


This article is the opinion of the authors and not necessarily the Council on Health Promotion or Doctors of BC. This article has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

1.    Murthy V. Surgeon general: Why I’m calling for a warning label on social media platforms. New York Times. 17 June 2024. Accessed 30 September 2024. www.nytimes.com/2024/06/17/opinion/social-media-health-warning.html.

2.    Ponti M. Screen time and preschool children: Promoting health and development in a digital world. Paediatr Child Health 2023;28:184-192.

3.    Abi-Jaoude E, Naylor KT, Pignatiello A. Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. CMAJ 2020;192:E136-E141.

Jennifer Balfour, MD, FRCPC, Aven Poynter, MD, FRCPC. Screen time: A call for action. BCMJ, Vol. 66, No. 10, December, 2024, Page(s) 386 - Council on Health Promotion.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply