Screening tool to identify deceptive online ads

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 60 , No. 9 , November 2018 , Pages 434-435 News

Researchers at the University of British Columbia have devised a simple screening tool (Figure) to evaluate if a health product that appears on the Internet is likely to be a scam. The Risk of Deception Tool (https://news.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-Health-Scams-Assessment-Tool.jpg) assigns points based on the type and number of persuasion techniques used in an ad. If the ad includes a celebrity endorsement, it gets one point; if it uses pseudo-technical language, it gets another point. More points are added if the ad uses mystical language or claims that the product is very rare or in short supply. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability that the ad is a scam.

The system was devised by a team of two nurses, two doctors, two physiotherapists, a pharmacist, and a social worker, all from UBC.

Researchers analyzed advertisements targeting 112 different health concerns. They found that the most common deceptive ads were those promoting bodybuilding and weight loss, followed by medicinal products, which claim to treat pain, asthma, or other conditions, and lifestyle products, which include antiaging or sexual enhancement remedies.

The developers also found a high number of advertisements from alternative health practitioners that made claims that were well outside what their therapies could reasonably achieve. Most of the scams identified originated in the United States. Misleading health ads on the Internet are concerning because consumers may end up self-medicating, say researchers.

The study, “Internet health scams—developing a taxonomy and risk-of-deception assessment tool,” was published in Health and Social Care in the Community. The lead researcher is Bernie Garrett, an associate professor in the UBC School of Nursing.

. Screening tool to identify deceptive online ads. BCMJ, Vol. 60, No. 9, November, 2018, Page(s) 434-435 - News.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply