Planning a birth after C-section made simpler

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 63, No. 63, July August 2021, Page 237 News

My Next Birth is a personalized online interactive patient decision aid now being used throughout BC to help people who have previously had a C-section make better-informed decisions about navigating their next pregnancy and birth. Over 75% of people in BC who have had a C-section are good candidates for a vaginal birth after cesarean, but families often have to wait until the next pregnancy to start discussing options with their care team. People want to learn about their options for their next birth sooner. Researchers conducted a series of qualitative studies and surveys in BC and found that families and care teams needed more support when exchanging information.[1-4] Families wanted to know what the reasons were for their first C-section. Was it from something unexpected that happened during labor? Is this something that might happen again in the future? What are the options for their next birth?

The program helps them think about their preferences and jot down their questions, and it provides tailored information specific to their values and needs. It also factors in where they live in BC so they can consider what resources are available locally. After they work through the website, they receive a personalized summary to guide conversations and questions with their health care team.

The program also provides tools for health care teams, including a decision support algorithm that walks the care provider through the patient’s journey and a list of conversation prompts to guide discussions after a C-section. The hope is that the program can be a support for families to be active participants in their care.

Dr Sarah Munro, an assistant professor in obstetrics and gynecology, developed the program with her team at UBC in partnership with Perinatal Services BC, provincial health authorities, the Ministry of Health, as well as patient partners. For more information, visit www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/health-professionals/professional-resources/birth-after-caesarean.

References

1.    Munro S, Kornelsen J, Wilcox E, et al. Implementation of shared decision-making in healthcare policy and practice: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2020;16:393-411.

2.    Munro S, Wilcox E, Lambert LK, et al. A survey of health care practitioners’ attitudes toward shared decision-making for choice of next birth after cesarean. Birth Issues in Perinatal Care 2021;48:194-208.

3.    Munro S, Janssen P, Corbett K, et al. Seeking control in the midst of uncertainty: Women’s experiences of choosing mode of birth after caesarean. Women and Birth 2017;30:129-136.

4.    Munro S, Kornelsen J, Corbett K, et al. Do women have a choice? Care providers’ and decision makers’ perspectives on barriers to access of health services for birth after a previous cesarean. 2017;44:153-160.

. Planning a birth after C-section made simpler. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 63, July, August, 2021, Page(s) 237 - News.


Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply