Access to care in BC scores low in poll

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 55, No. 3, April 2013, Pages 139-140 News

For the most part, Canadians believe the health care system is better than it was 5 years ago, a new Ipsos-Reid survey has found. Ontario comes out on top as the most improved, while the lowest scores come out of British Columbia and the Atlantic region. 

The online survey was conducted from 4–18 January for the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement, and results were presented at the CHFI’s annual CEO forum in Montreal.

The survey asked respondents to assess access to care over the past 5 years, with 29% saying it is easier and 25% judging it to be worse. Respondents were also asked to assess individual aspects of care, with access to drugs and diagnostics getting the highest scores, and access to specialists the lowest. 

The survey also explored seven variables related to the patient experience: better information shared, more options for treatment, better level of care, better coordinated, more sensitive to needs, better quality, and speedier.

Combining all these assessments, Ipsos-Reid found Ontario and the Prairies to be the clear winners in the survey while BC came in last.

The survey results also revealed that a majority of respondents (52%) believe the health care system is not efficiently using financial and other resources. One-third of those polled agreed with the proposition that they feel abandoned in the health system and are left to figure out what to do next, and 43% agreed with the statement that their experience has made them not trust any process in the system or its professionals.

The poll results can be viewed at www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=12452.

. Access to care in BC scores low in poll. BCMJ, Vol. 55, No. 3, April, 2013, Page(s) 139-140 - News.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply