Kudos to the BCMA and BC government for attracting 650 FPs to Vancouver for the joint symposium. Not only were the terms attractive but the importance of what is at stake well recognized.
There were several clear messages. There were some excellent, thought-provoking presentations, but the government’s representatives failed either to reassure or impress. While they may see the significance of family medicine, they gave no clue as to how it will be sustained.
I was puzzled as to why we heard two fine British FPs describe their achievements when British family medicine really does not apply here and never will without capitation. Most BC doctors do not want capitation. However, the British doctors clearly relayed that pay parity with specialists is what saved the GMS. The BCMA admits that past negotiations have left FPs well behind our specialist colleagues, although an explanation for this was not given.
At least we came away with some good ideas about improving practice. Electronic medical records, communicating well with our staff, employing RNs to their full capacity, and arranging to see today’s urgent calls today. However, I hope the BCMA and government heard that this is just too difficult at current remuneration and is not the career choice of enough new graduates. It does not help when a new graduate can earn as much in walk-in clinic medicine, with shorter hours and no on-call or ongoing responsibility. Despite being told at PQIDS, the BCMA chooses to overlook this critical issue. This is forcing many of us to offer less full-service family medicine and more short-visit urgent care medicine to compete and catch up financially. The results in the long term will be fewer FPs seeing more and more patients, for less intense care, with earlier referrals to the growing numbers of our specialist colleagues. But already specialists too decry this situation when they see how poor short-visit medicine can be and how difficult it is for a complex patient to have an FP with time to do the required, poorly paid work.
Despite this I remain a happy, still married FP and enjoy my work. I teach students every year and try to sow the seeds of good family medicine. Somehow we must solve the dilemma or we will all retire from a soon-to-be extinct group that was never adequately recognized or remunerated.
—Rick Potter-Cogan, CCFP, MICGP
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org