I am inundated with requests from my patients to refill medications and assess conditions outside my scope. Many of them have disabilities and are unable to wait for hours at a walk-in clinic. There is a lack of resources to treat poverty, mental health, and addictions. The money should go there.
The paperwork and number of patient visits related to an injury is overwhelming. The bulk of these patients have soft-tissue injuries that are not quantifiable. A huge number of unnecessary imaging and consults are ordered to prove the diagnosis. I am an experienced physiatrist who teaches and lectures at home and abroad, but have absolutely no idea how to answer the generic questions found on those forms. Most doctors fill out what the patient tells them or face conflict, strains to the treating relationship, and letters of complaint. When I do a legal review it is alarming to see the number of times some patients see their family physician—three to four times per month, then twice per month, then monthly for years, with essentially no change. Serial visits to family doctors do not improve outcomes in litigation or open claims. Visits should be every 2 to 3 months for a chronic condition. “My lawyer/insurer says I must,” is not a medical necessity.
We need strict limits on visits for injury. After the initial assessments, insurers should be responsible. Even for significant pathology, there is no need to be assessed at frequent intervals. ICBC, WorkSafeBC, and insurers should stop feeding off the public trough and treat their own patients. We should just write that “The patient has limitations with their right arm. Please modify their job to accommodate or find them another position; if not, get a vocational and functional assessment and follow that plan.”
—Paul Winston, MD, FRCPC
Medical Director Rehabilitation and Transitions, Island Health
President, Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
1. Felhaber T. The risks of worklessness. Accessed 6 August 2019. https://thischangedmypractice.com/the-risks-of-worklessness.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org