Re: Unprofessional professionals

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 53, No. 10, December 2011, Page 520 Letters

I staggered through the mounting stack of old journals on my desk over the Thanksgiving long weekend and was disheartened by Dr Ana Porzecanski’s reply [BCMJ 2011;53:114] to Dr Day’s editorial in the January/February issue of the BCMJ [2011;53:6-7]. 

Dr Porzecanski seems to contend that the issue of unprofessional behavior in physicians is unique to the junior ranks of the profession. She makes several generalizations about products of the modern medical school selection system, suggesting that “future doctors… have serious impairments of empathy, humility, and dedication to patients,” among other comments. 

I think Dr Porzecanski has missed the point of Dr Day’s editorial. Unprofessional behavior is something that all physicians are capable of. In my brief career thus far, I have witnessed unprofessional behavior by medical students, fellow residents, and physicians of all manner of experience; by those who have been accepted to medical school on academic merit, on life experience, and on a combination of both.

I think I can speak for physicians young and old when I say that most of us consider ourselves genuine, sincere, caring individuals whose chief concern is patient care. I would as­sume that this viewpoint is common to young physicians of all eras, and has been from the time medical schools began accepting students at all.

Suggesting unprofessionalism is a disease of the young physician sounds to me like the same “they just don’t make them like they used to” ageist philosophy that I have, frustratingly, encountered all too often in my medical training. The system of medical education has changed and evolved over the years, but learning, teaching, and modeling professional standards of behavior remain important for all generations of care providers, not just the current one.
—Oliver Leslie, MD

Oliver Leslie, MD,. Re: Unprofessional professionals. BCMJ, Vol. 53, No. 10, December, 2011, Page(s) 520 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply