Re: Thoughts on professionalism

In response to our president’s “Thoughts on professionalism” in the June issue (BCMJ 2016;58:247), I would like to add comments pertaining to his third tenet of our profession’s longstanding tradition—the value and merit of the social contract.

This longstanding tradition of a historically great and independent profession predates this country’s tiny historical anomaly of forced and unconstitutional social contracts—a contract that is with the state rather than with the patient, contrary to our Hippocratic Oath. Forced because we have a single payer that has legislated a monopoly, and because doctors must travel abroad to change their employers. Unconstitutional because it is a rationing monopoly, at least hurting patients in need.

The issue has become far more concerning recently for patients and physicians alike because the topic of physician-assisted death now also raises the uncomfortable question of whether physicians have finally become de facto agents of the state in this country.

Since professionalism is rather defined by skills, good judgment, and polite behavior that is expected from a person who is trained to do a job well, we should ask ourselves: where has our collective independence of thought and actions necessary to support good judgment gone lately? And will our patients be better off for its apparent absence?

Advocacy for our patients should be the real cornerstone of our profession, and it requires independence. Fighting internal and external factors that degrade our ability to advocate and care for patients and reverting the erosion of our profession is the ultimate healing goal for the profession itself.

This social contract that imposed itself slowly across several generations, by misrepresenting the original aim of Tommy Douglas, can only be seen as a clumsy ideological vestige of the past. It interferes with our primary commitment: our patients.

Dr Ruddiman, what we are fortunate to have is not that social contract but a direct contract with our patients, and having had an opportunity to acquire an amazing education (rapidly paid back with income tax), lifesaving skills in a very rewarding profession—an old one indeed—all these transcending ideology, generations, postal codes, and bureaucrats. That should be the foundation of our independence.

Our problem is then that we, as a profession, no longer believe that we belong to a great independent profession; rather, we subject ourselves to whatever master of the day is willing to pay us. Mercenaries, agents of the state, whatever you may want to call us, we are no longer the healers of the Hippocratic Oath. The legacy will not be excellent 21st-century medical care and we will be remembered as enablers who replaced the Hippocratic Oath with an oath (little “o”) to the state. And isn’t that what we do not want to become!
—J.N. Mahy, MD, FRCSC, FACS
Burnaby

J.N. Mahy, MD, FRCSC, FACS. Re: Thoughts on professionalism. BCMJ, Vol. 58, No. 7, September, 2016, Page(s) 359-360 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply