Re: Pseudoscience, anti-science, and woo

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 61 , No. 1 , January February 2019 , Pages 9 Letters

Dr Cadesky wrote a powerful editorial on the importance of stories in patient education [BCMJ 2018;60:343]. While I wholeheartedly agree on the effectiveness of using personal narrative to drive social change, I wish to also point out the importance of physicians’ language in engaging patients. Dr Cadesky encourages “[mentioning] our wheelchair-bound patients who have polio to vaccine-hesitant parents.”

As a physiatrist, I regularly work with patients who use wheelchairs. Many will tell you that these devices are not binding, but rather opening. Wheelchairs may help our patients do things many able-bodied individuals take for granted—move about on our sidewalks and in our parks instead of being stuck at home, conserve the energy it takes to walk with a disability so that it can be better spent on time with family, and participate in sports like wheelchair basketball for social and health benefits.

The language we as physicians use has a powerful influence on how patients see themselves, how families see patients, how our colleagues and medical learners see patients, and how patients feel their physicians see them. Thus, language can help empower our patients, or it can alienate them. I encourage my fellow physicians to consider their own unconscious biases toward their patients who are differently abled, and to reflect how this plays out in the words they use in clinical settings. Maybe we need to change the language we use in our stories, too.
—Ranita Manocha, MD, FRCPC
Calgary, AB

This letter was submitted in response to “Pseudoscience, anti-science, and woo: This time it’s personal.”

Ranita Manocha, MD, FRCPC. Re: Pseudoscience, anti-science, and woo. BCMJ, Vol. 61, No. 1, January, February, 2019, Page(s) 9 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply