Re: Primary care needs more access to doctors, not less

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 66, No. 5, June 2024, Page 149 Letters
By: Thomas J. DeMarco, MD

I wish to affirm the Premise put forward by Drs Bell and Sloan that both patients and physicians benefit from increased access to primary care [BCMJ 2024;66:14-15].

I have been in family practice for 40 years. I have been on call for most of that time. Earlier in my career, I was generally available 24/7, as I was mostly doing locums in remote solo practices, often in the Arctic. For the past 28 years, I have “limited” my availability to about 14 hours/day, 7 days/week, year-round. This includes most days that I am away on holiday, which averages 13 weeks/year. Wherever I am, I turn off my phone at 8 p.m., guaranteeing a good night’s sleep. About half of my 2500 patients have my personal contact information. They know not to call me, but they may text or email anytime, in English, French, or Spanish.

What is the consequence of this engagement? Happy patients and a happy, healthy doctor. So far, I have accumulated 4 days of disability—1 day for a bad flu in 1986 (no flu vaccine back then), 1 day to recover from esophageal surgery for a Zenker diverticulum, and 2 days off work after a total hip replacement (I cycled to the office on day 8 post-op). I have never experienced fatigue or burnout. On the contrary, I consider my life essentially stress-free. I continue to indulge in many other pursuits, including cycling a minimum of 10 000 km/year for the past 21 years, all over the world. At age 64, I enjoy practising medicine as much as ever and hope to continue to serve my patients for many years to come.
—Thomas DeMarco, MD
Whistler
 

hidden

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Thomas J. DeMarco, MD. Re: Primary care needs more access to doctors, not less. BCMJ, Vol. 66, No. 5, June, 2024, Page(s) 149 - Letters.


Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply