Re: Pharmacists

I am troubled by the rather dismissive tone of Dr Richardson’s May 2013 editorial regarding the clinical services proposals made by the BC Pharmacy Association in March of this year [“Pharmacists,” BCMJ 2013;55:181]. It appears that you have not read the proposals themselves but rather are commenting on a media story about the proposals.

The disparaging approach you have taken to addressing the opportunity to have pharmacists provide pa­tient services like the treatment of minor ailments is regrettable. It does little to support the often-advocated position that physicians want to partner with other health care professionals. 

You question whether pharmacist-administered flu shots have saved the health care system money. The answer is yes. Pharmacists are paid less than physicians to administer flu shots and so the more they do the more money is saved.

On the issue of the clinical services we believe should be adopted in BC, all are operating successfully in other provinces or other countries. Our concept is simple: improve access to patient care where appropriate and reduce costs to the health care system. Certainly it seems clear to pharmacists that the current health care system is unsustainable and all health care professionals need to do their part to practise to their full expertise in the delivery of patient-centred, safe, accessible care. 

On the issue of pharmacists having a financial incentive to prescribe for minor ailments, the logic isn’t there. We have proposed that pharmacists be compensated for the patient interaction. There is no reason to believe that there is any greater likelihood that they would prescribe an unnecessary medication than would a family physician when dealing with a patient who has diaper rash or mosquito bites.
—Geraldine Vance
CEO, BC Pharmacy Association

Geraldine Vance, APR,. Re: Pharmacists. BCMJ, Vol. 55, No. 6, July, August, 2013, Page(s) 274 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply