I was interested to read the April 2021 article, “Management of vulnerable adult patients seeking to leave hospital: Understanding and using relevant legislation,” having had just such a conundrum during my shift the previous evening. Unfortunately, the article did not specifically address a certain common situation. Any insights from the authors would be much appreciated.
Incapacity due to addiction
By my reading of the article, my patient (whose parents were strongly advocating be involuntarily admitted due to severe and progressive self-neglect as a result of alcoholism) fulfills the criteria to allow treatment under the Adult Guardianship Act (AGA) (1. self-neglect, 2. risks, already experienced—e.g., loss of licence to drunk driving, assault charges etc., and 3. incapacity due to chronic unremitting intoxication).
It is not regular practice to force treatment due to addictions. This patient was kept under the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act until sober enough to ambulate safely and have a discussion regarding his situation, at which point he could voluntarily continue treatment or leave against medical advice.
Is this sober window (reportedly the only such window in a very long time) enough to allow the patient to voluntarily proceed back into his state of chronic alcohol-induced incapacity (not withstanding that the illness of addiction renders the patient incapable of avoiding further intoxication)? If it is not, should we be using the AGA routinely in cases of addicted vulnerable adults?
Also, the fictional case of Ms Safe was a useful illustration. I imagine the statement that she’d “be fine” was explored in more detail. What if she’d meant: (1) I’ll be fine because I wish to die from this illness, or (2) I understand the risks you’re telling me but I’ll be fine with the natural medicines I’m using, or my faith that God will heal me?
—Roger Seldon, MBChB, MD
This letter was submitted in response to “Management of vulnerable adult patients seeking to leave hospital: Understanding and using relevant legislation.”
Read the authors’ response in “Re: Managing vulnerable patients. Authors reply.”
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org