Re: The hospitalist program

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 45, No. 10, December 2003, Pages 485-486 Letters

I am writing regarding the article “The hospitalist program: A new specialty on the horizon in acute care medicine,” BCMJ 2003;45(8):391-394.

It occurs to me that the hospitalist program is well intentioned, however, wrongly staffed; I explain: staffing the hospitals with general practitioners from the community at large only exacerbates the very problem that it is supposed to help, the orphaned patients. In fact, it takes away from general practice the very physicians who are in greatest demand, those who can truly treat all patients, regardless of their age and medical problem. I instead believe that the hospitalist program should be staffed with those physicians who are waiting in the queue to enter the IMG (International Medical Graduate) credentialing system in BC, of whom there are many doing menial jobs and wasting their expertise waiting for a chance. What better medium than a hospital, where they can be assessed by their peers, sharpen their medical and language skills, and work under supervision, as well as make a decent wage with which to have a proper start in Canada?

Too bad the Ministry of Health and/or the College do not see this superb opportunity for what it really is: a way to assess and register the foreign physicians among our population, giving them at the same time a way to make a start here and provide to those approved a way to enter our exceedingly inflexible medical system. The proposal, if implemented, would surely go a good way to providing more physician bodies to help in these times of serious depletion amongst our ranks, both specialists and general practitioners.

—Alex Porzecanski, MD

Alex Porzecanski, MD. Re: The hospitalist program. BCMJ, Vol. 45, No. 10, December, 2003, Page(s) 485-486 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply