The BC Medical Journal is always informative and appealing, including its January/February issue with the interesting article, “The world’s most poisonous mushroom, Amanita phalloides, is growing in BC” (2019;61:20-24).
I am writing about the cover illustration. This eye-catching drawing of the death cap beside the title “The world’s most poisonous mushroom is growing in BC” successfully attracts readers’ attention to the seriousness of this poisoning. However, it may imply that all parts of the death cap are green with dark green dots on its cap, stem, and volva, which is not correct.
As a former medical and, recently, environmental toxicologist who used to work in areas where mushroom poisoning was endemic, and having published on this subject, I have noticed that the clinical findings as well as the appearance of poisonous mushrooms are sometimes misidentified among health and medical experts. Mushroom poisoning is rare in Canada; therefore, professionals are less familiar with the issue.
A picture is worth a thousand words! People may forget the text but are more likely to remember this illustration. What if health professionals or mushroom hunters perceive the “World’s most poisonous mushroom that grows in BC” to be green with dark green dots everywhere? More importantly, can this picture give the impression that mushrooms with other appearances, let’s say white ones or those that have no dots on their stem, are safe to consume? This beautiful illustration on the cover page may have unintentional educational consequences for your readers.
The take-home message is that macro features [Figure] of the death cap are important, may vary, and can even resemble edible mushrooms with potential to confuse amateur mushroom hunters or health professionals.
—Reza Afshari, MD, MPH, PhD
Senior Scientist, Toxicology, BC Centre for Disease Control
Adjunct Professor, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
Professor of Medical Toxicology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Editor in Chief, Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org