Infection control in BC operating rooms

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 61, No. 5, June 2019, Page 201 Letters

There is little difference between the practice of infection control in an operating room and religious dogma. Here are three examples that are patently ridiculous. Sinus surgery done by an ENT surgeon in the operating room is basically through snot but we make sure that the patient is prepped and draped. Hemorrhoidectomies are done by general surgery on a patient’s anus but we prep and drape the patient. Maxillofacial surgeons do mandibular osteotomies where the oral mucosa is cut into, the mandible is sawed in two, then plated with screws and closed, but we prep and drape this patient also. “Antibiotics for the lawyers” are sometimes given in the first example, never given in the second example, and always given in the third example.

In the big picture, the infection control practices in operating rooms have a very bad effect on the planet as most waste winds up either in the ocean or the atmosphere.

Even though much has been written about this, very little has been done about it, basically because the power structures in place in hospitals are just fine with the status quo. And the prime purpose of these power structures is to employ people, not to decrease infections.

A small first step in British Columbia would be to stop the surgical prep and draping for the three aforementioned examples.

The same can be said (i.e., that it is patently ridiculous) about the strict enforcement of dress codes in operating rooms in British Columbia. There is no evidence for this, but signaling who is in charge is very important to the power structures in hospitals, usually under the rubric of standards.
—Mark Elliott, MD

Mark Elliott, MD, FRCPC. Infection control in BC operating rooms. BCMJ, Vol. 61, No. 5, June, 2019, Page(s) 201 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply