In-hospital post-op visits by surgeons and GPs

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 54, No. 8, October 2012, Pages 383-384 Letters

When I started in practice in Victoria many years ago, each day I made a point of visiting those patients in hospital on whom I had operated, until they were discharged. After some years I made an arrangement with three other gynecologists by which one of the four of us would cover the practices of the other three each weekend. The one on call would then visit the hospital patients of all four of us each day. Although there was usually little to do during these visits, I believe the patients appreciated them and knowing they had not been forgotten or abandoned.

My wife was recently in hospital with a fracture of the neck of the femur. This was appropriately treated by screw fixation 3 days later, the delay being due to a very busy weekend in the OR and other factors not the fault of the surgeon.

However, as far as I know, the surgeon did not visit her at all during the time she remained in the hospital—my wife certainly has no recollection of having been seen by him or any other of the surgeons in his group. The nursing care, so frequently castigated these days, was absolutely first class as was the attention of the physiotherapy staff. I can only presume that the surgeon was apprised of her progress by these members of the team. 

I feel this is a sad reflection of lack of interest on the part of the medical profession, and gives an unfortunate impression to the public. In marked distinction was the fact that our family doctor (who was away at the time of this incident and only found out about it on the day of his return) went into the hospital at 8:15 p.m. to see her.
—H. Martin Gough, MD

H. Martin Gough, MD. In-hospital post-op visits by surgeons and GPs . BCMJ, Vol. 54, No. 8, October, 2012, Page(s) 383-384 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply