The intent of my editorial was not to elicit a defensive response from the architects or supporters of the admission process. Nor did I anticipate that they would refer to an interview process carried out by physicians as a “lottery.” Sensitive physicians might consider that an insult to their professional abilities and judgment.
I am always suspicious of writers who quote their own work as authoritative and providing evidence of reliability. I tediously checked out the references quoted above, and they provide absolutely no evidence that the selection process that Eva and Finkler promote identifies candidates who will make better doctors. I find their bibliography to be selective, and others refute their claims.
If the current interview process is based on sound research why, having now analyzed it, will they no longer ask candidates to play with building blocks? What happened to the “published evidence” that validated it? Will they still ask candidates to pretend to be an animal, and where is the data that those who have a preference for being a particular animal make better doctors?
I am confident that few, if any, of the current UBC professors or deans would get through the current admission process. I have never, as Eva and Finkler suggest, questioned the ethics and principles of those involved in the current process. I simply question the validity of the testing method.
Our current crop of medical students is excellent. The reality is that with almost seven qualified applicants for each space, even an unfair process could deliver 288 good candidates. And it does.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org