"Conversation" yields consensus

Although Dr Geoffrey Appleton, BCMA president, has concluded that the Conversation on Health failed to provide any consensus (“Consensus? There is no consensus,” BCMJ, 2008;50(1):10, Health Minister George Abbott suggests otherwise. In his greeting on the web site www.bcconversationonhealth.ca, Mr Abbott mentions four points that he has taken from the government’s process to elicit opinions from British Columbians about their health care system. 

The first is that the citizens want “A strong and sustainable public health care system that delivers services to all British Colum­bians regardless of where they live, their incomes or their backgrounds and cultures.”

Dr Appleton, the BCMA, and the government have stressed that the Canada Health Act be amended with a sixth principle of sustainability. According to the summary of input, which has a meagre paragraph on the reactions to this proposal, consensus was in fact elusive on this proposal. If sustainability means health care should not overwhelm provincial budgets, many citizens would likely agree. 

If it means “determining the scope of publicly funded services [and] implementing cost sharing arrangements,” as the BCMA said, agreement would be more difficult to reach given that BC has a budget surplus.

Public spending for health care in Canada is already on the low end of the spectrum among OECD countries. Physiotherapy, dental care, eye care, and many medications are not covered by Health Insurance BC, a situation about which participants in the Conversation complained. 

How much more cost does the BCMA leadership suggest be shifted to the individual, along with the burden on physicians of collecting payments from patients and insurers?

—Joanna Cheek, MD
—Margaret McGregor, MD
—Francois Proulx, MD
—Randall F. White, MD
—Robert F. Woolard, MD

Joanna Cheek, MD, FRCPC, Margaret McGregor, MD,, Francois Proulx, MD, FRCPC, Randall F. White, MD,, Robert Woollard, MD, CCFP, FCFP, LM. "Conversation" yields consensus. BCMJ, Vol. 50, No. 4, May, 2008, Page(s) 186 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply