CME costs

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 52, No. 2, March 2010, Page 65 Letters

I am just beginning to appreciate the momentous change that has come about concerning CME, now a mandated 80 hours per year versus an honor-bound commitment.

In my view, this changes entirely the spectrum of funding from the BCMA’s CME fund.

My current year’s allotment would cover about three Saturdays of CME if tuition expense was the only component. The Royal College on the other hand demands the equivalent 10 Saturdays per year, on average, as well as the for-profit margin of, what is it, about $375 per year payable to itself, just for keeping a database on my self-reported CME experience. What a huge increase in nonrecoverable costs this is, especially to those of us at or near retirement or on other sources of fixed income. 

The Law Society, according to my son, a lawyer, has long insisted on 30 hours per year, along with some required self-study. It is difficult to see these new College CME requirements in any other light than age discrimination.

Still there is some hope for us. Our Education Committee should recognize the altered taxation treatment for scholarships afforded by the Canada Revenue Agency. Scholarships and such are now tax exempt. I recommend the Education Committee at once look into segregating the tuition portion of CME funding as a scholarship or bursary or other form of tax-exempt funding, going forward. 

This would ease the disproportionate burden placed upon partly retireds and near-retired boomers who so do want to pursue life-long learning. To do so would be totally in keeping with medicine as an honorable profession. The alternative would be to squeeze us further out of continuing medical contributions to our communities in our later years.
—Robert Grist, MD
Maple Ridge

Robert Grist, MD. CME costs. BCMJ, Vol. 52, No. 2, March, 2010, Page(s) 65 - Letters.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply