Ageism?

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 44, No. 6, July August 2002, Page 286 Letters

Recently, within 24 hours, two disturbing incidents concerning senior citizens and their family physicians came to the attention of this fellow septuagenarian.

One older patient who is the ongoing provider for a family with a mentally handicapped dependant, and who has been affected with ongoing renal failure, told his wife that he had been declared by his ($400 000 + $50 000) GP that he was too old to qualify for dialysis. The anguished wife was later reassured on good authority that age plays no part in the criteria for dialysis.

The other patient, who has helped to successfully raise a large, productive family despite many hardships and heath problems, told me of her belief that her GP did not like old patients. Having finally found a new (expensive) drug that clearly controlled her digestive problems, and having assumed that her GP might be willing to make a request for a repeat special Rx, she was told to “never mind,” after being reminded of the inconvenience that such a special request entailed. Consequently, after returning to an older “covered” prescription, her digestive distress returned. She is hoping to find a more understanding doctor.

As it still seems true that doctors relate better to patients of their own generation, is it unreasonable to suppose that some may have lost sight of the particular demands of their own (perhaps underprivileged) parents, uncles, or grandmothers?

—W.D. Panton, MD
Burnaby

W.D. Panton, MD. Ageism?. BCMJ, Vol. 44, No. 6, July, August, 2002, Page(s) 286 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply