Recognizing the value of longitudinal care: The Community Longitudinal Family Physician Payment

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 62, No. 1, January February 2020, Pages 25, 28 Family Practice Services Committee

Multiple studies have shown that long-term, relationship-based care from a family physician results in better health outcomes for patients.[1-3] In BC, this care is largely provided by community-based family physicians who work under the fee-for-service structure and who care for a panel of patients—a role that often requires additional, nonclinical responsibilities that are not compensated through the fee-for-service billing system. In recognition of their important role in providing longitudinal care, many fee-for-service family physicians are now eligible to receive the GPSC Community Longitudinal Family Physician (CLFP) Payment.

In January 2020, eligible family physicians (as determined through billing data), received a CLFP Payment ranging from $3000 to $12 000 (with the majority receiving between $4000 and $8000). The GPSC has allocated $19.5 million annually for these payments.

Determining eligibility

Fee-for-service community-based family physicians are eligible to receive the CLFP Payment if they:

  • Have billed the GPSC Portal Code (G14070) in 2018 and 2019, prior to 19 June 2019.
  • Are shown to be providing longitudinal care to a group of patients through MSP billing data.

Payment amounts for each eligible physician will vary according to the number and the complexity of Majority Source of Care (MSOC) patients assigned to them. The MSOC methodology is commonly used by the BC Ministry of Health to measure patient attachment to health care practitioners, including family physicians.

The CLFP Payment uses the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) methodology to estimate the complexity of each MSOC patient associated with each eligible physician. The ACG methodology enables payment amounts to reflect a wide range of diagnoses and health conditions that can be expected to influence health care utilization. (For detailed information on ACG methodology, download the FAQ document from the webpage linked at the end of this article.)

Payment remittance

The CLFP Payment is remitted automatically by MSP Teleplan to eligible physicians. This means physicians do not have to navigate complicated billing rules or meet additional documentation requirements to receive the payment.

The 2019 CLFP Payment was paid to the payee number where a GPSC Portal Code (G14070) was first submitted in 2019 and may be subject to business arrangements pertaining to how MSP payments paid to particular payee numbers are split between physicians and clinic owners. In these cases, physicians and clinic owners are encouraged to come to a mutual agreement on how existing business arrangements apply to the CLFP Payment.

Comprehensive care outside the community practice office setting

The GPSC acknowledges the importance of the comprehensive primary care provided by family physicians outside the community practice office setting, including maternity, in-hospital, and long-term care. In the past decade, the GPSC has continued to fund enhanced supports in these areas, providing annual funding of $7 million for maternity care, $12 million for long-term care, and $25 million for in-hospital care. This amounts to an additional $6000 to $11 000 on average per physician per year for physicians practising in those areas.

To further support in-hospital and maternity care in 2019 and beyond, the GPSC approved an additional 30% lift to select in-hospital and obstetrical fee items this year.[4]

Eligible physicians will receive those fee increases along with retroactive payments in early 2020. The GPSC will continue to consider ways to further support physicians working to provide this comprehensive scope of primary care.

Preparing for next year’s payment

The exact eligibility criteria for future CLFP Payments are currently being finalized. If eligible, physicians should continue to submit the GPSC Portal Code (G14070) on an annual basis to signify they are continuing to provide full-service family practice services to patients and confirming the doctor-patient relationship with existing patients through a standardized conversation.

If you have questions or would like more information, contact or download the physician FAQ document posted at
—Shelley Ross, MD
Co-chair, General Practice Services Committee


This article is the opinion of the GPSC and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    Thanh NX, Rapoport J. Health services utilization of people having and not having a regular doctor in Canada. Int J Health Plann Manage 2017;32:180-188.

2.    Maarsingh OR, Henry Y, van de Ven PM, Deeg DJH. Continuity of care in primary care and association with survival in older people: A 17-year prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66:e531-e539.

3.    Gruneir A, Bronskill SE, Maxwell CJ, et al. The association between multimorbidity and hospitalization is modified by individual demographics and physician continuity of care: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:154.

4.    General Practice Services Committee. GPSC increases maternity and in-hospital fees. Accessed 12 December 2019.

Shelley Ross, MD. Recognizing the value of longitudinal care: The Community Longitudinal Family Physician Payment. BCMJ, Vol. 62, No. 1, January, February, 2020, Page(s) 25, 28 - Family Practice Services Committee.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply