Tending the garden: Reflections on family medicine

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 68, No. 2, March 2026, Page 53 Editorials

I recently began to learn about gardening. There was unused space in my yard and bare soil ready to be filled, and the idea of growing a beautiful garden was appealing. What I did not expect was how difficult gardening could be, and how the lessons learned would reflect my work in family medicine.

One of the first lessons gardening teaches is that you cannot rush growth. No amount of watering will make a seed sprout faster, and no amount of attention will make a plant grow before it is ready. In family medicine, we are often asked to take on more patients in our panel, see more patients each day, and do more administrative tasks like completing forms and writing reports. But so much of what we do and what is centrally important is building relationships with patients over time. Managing chronic diseases, supporting mental health, and encouraging healthy lifestyle choices all take time and effort. We are chipping away, one piece at a time, and this cannot be rushed.

Another lesson became clear when many of my plants failed to thrive. The issue was not the plants themselves, but the soil and the environment. Until I improved drainage, added nutrients, and allowed areas to recover, the garden struggled. The same applies to medicine. The system we work in determines our ability to provide effective care. In British Columbia, ongoing challenges such as limited access to primary care, long wait times, and inequitable health care delivery all directly impact patient care. Asking physicians to thrive without first addressing these issues is like blaming a plant for struggling in depleted soil. With the introduction of the Longitudinal Family Physician Payment Model, which has been a system-wide change in family medicine, both physicians and patients have benefited greatly.

Gardening has also taught me the importance of restraint. Too much intervention can be harmful. Overwatering kills more plants than neglect does. In family medicine, we see this lesson often. Overinvestigation and overprescribing can create unintended harm and put unnecessary strain on our system. Doing more does not necessarily equate to providing better care. Early in my training, I often felt pressure to act—to order tests or to offer treatments—because patients are often looking for immediate answers. But in family medicine, we are in a unique position to practise longitudinal care and develop an understanding of patients over time. With experience, I have learned when observation and monitoring can be appropriate and effective. Knowing when to step back is also an important skill.

Finally, the quiet, hard work of tending to a garden may feel isolating at times, like in family medicine, where fatigue and burnout can also feel isolating. Family medicine is not about dramatic lifesaving moments; rather, it is about showing up, season after season, caring for our patients in small, meaningful ways, but making a lasting impact. This is the true power of family medicine.

Gardening has reinforced several truths about family medicine: growth cannot be rushed, strong support systems are essential, and restraint is often necessary. As spring approaches, I encourage colleagues to take time to slow down and admire the nature and beauty our home of British Columbia has to offer. Maybe even take up gardening. You may find, as I did, that it has as much to teach us about medicine as it does about plants.
—Yvonne Sin, MD

hidden


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Yvonne Sin, MD. Tending the garden: Reflections on family medicine. BCMJ, Vol. 68, No. 2, March, 2026, Page(s) 53 - Editorials.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply