In Part 2 of this theme issue we focus on some currently available tools and challenge readers to consider certain questions.
|Dr Eric Cadesky||Dr Kendall Ho|
In Part 1 of this theme issue we explored how technology can be used to improve access to and quality of health care. The history and future of the electronic medical record (EMR) were considered and the Carrier Sekani Family Services primary care model was featured. In Part 2 we focus on some currently available tools and challenge readers to consider the following questions:
• Why should physicians participate in this digital health transformation—and can we afford not to?
• What are the advantages of digital health for patients, health professionals, and health systems?
• What are the threats to quality and safety of care?
• What role can physicians play in creating the digital future?
In the first article, Dr Kendall Ho and colleagues report on mobile apps, wearables, and sensor technology. Drs Damon Ramsay and Puneet Seth then discuss the need for a collaborative health record (CHR) system that permits asynchronous interactions and improves clinician productivity. Finally, Mr Michael Bidu considers BC’s digital health ecosystem and the importance of entrepreneurs and physicians working together.
As physicians who believe in the promise of digital health, we look forward to a time when user-friendly, relationship-enhancing, physician-informed technology is an accepted part of medical care, and we welcome your feedback on the concepts and practices highlighted in these articles.
—Eric Cadesky, MDCM, CCFP
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, UBC Faculty of Medicine
—Kendall Ho, MD
Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, UBC Faculty of Medicine
This article has been peer reviewed.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org