A few months ago I got a letter from the College. If you are like me you get a panic attack when even the College Quarterly arrives, but this time it was the one. By the grace of God more than good judgment, I have managed to practise blemish free for 30 years, but this was a "letter of enquiry." A patient of mine had died in a house fire and a concerned friend had written to the College expressing the conviction that her friend had died because her GP and I had oversedated her, making her unable to respond to the fire caused by the deep fat she had left overheating on the stove. This patient had indeed been on fairly high dosages of antidepressants and benzodiazepines—although within indications. I had struggled for years to reduce her intake or switch her to less dependency-producing medications, but without success. We had one stand-up row when her Ativan "fell into the toilet," remarkably sparing the antidepressant. Despite my best efforts she always managed to get back to her original prescription, claiming that it was the only thing that had ever helped her.
The College letter did concern me, though, and I spent considerable time preparing my response. Salvation eventually arrived in the form of a toxicology report. My patient had large amounts of heroin in her system and not a trace of the drugs I had prescribed. I had no idea she abused narcotics—or that she was presumably selling benzodiazepines for something stronger—but I was greatly relieved to learn that I had no part in her demise. I must admit that I found the College to be very sympathetic and supportive, though I have colleagues whose experiences have been different. For me the relief faded and anger arose as I considered some of the questions this incident raised.
Even if my patient had died in a benzodiazepine fog, does that make me responsible? Are physicians to be held accountable even for medication abuse? Are we responsible for the behavior of our patients after they have left our offices? I wonder if this could be a cultural phenomenon. Despite being a proud citizen, I find Canada to be a blame-seeking society. Whatever the crisis—Somalia, the Red Cross, Walkerton—there seems to be a concerted attempt to reduce it to a simple black-and-white analysis and find some poor sucker to nail to the wall. We in medicine are particularly vulnerable as the Canadian public continues to ignore the concept of individual responsibility. Their pioneering forebears would be horrified.
The practice of medicine is tough. To be held responsible for events not directly related to treatment makes it virtually impossible. This time I dodged the bullet. The next time I—or perhaps you—might not be so lucky.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org