The dangers of driving and talking on the cellphone

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 51, No. 2, March 2009, Page 58 Council on Health Promotion

What would we do if we heard a patient say, “Dear, why don’t you have several stiff drinks, put on a pair of blinkers” (like horses wear), “and drive over and pick up Johnny at school?” I think we’d be taken aback. However, haven’t we heard many of our patients say something like, “Call me on your cellphone while you’re on your way to pick up Johnny at school.” A great deal of evidence suggests that both requests will put the driver and everyone else on the road at a similar risk for an auto crash. The use of a cellphone while driving is clearly risky, and physicians should counsel their patients to avoid this risky use while driving.

What are the effects of cellphone use on ability to drive? There is a growing body of evidence, including methodologically sound studies of crash risk, that cellphone use by drivers substantially increases the risk of a crash.[1] Cellphone use is associated with both a fourfold increase in crashes serious enough to injure the driver[2] and a fourfold increase in property-damage-only crashes.3 Strayer and colleagues completed a study using a high-fidelity driving simulator and concluded that the impairments associated with using a cellphone while driving can be as profound as those associated with driving while drunk. They found that participants using a cellphone had delayed braking reactions and were involved in more traffic accidents than when they were not conversing on a cellphone. By contrast, when drivers were intoxicated from ethanol they exhibited a more aggressive driving style, following closer to the vehicle immediately in front of them, and applying more force while braking.[4] In their seminal article, Redelmeier and Tibshirani reported that epidemiological evidence suggests that the relative risk of being in a traffic accident while using a cellphone is similar to the hazard associated with driving with a blood alcohol level at the legal limit.[3]

Numerous authors have found that the impairment that cellphone use causes to driving performance occurs regardless of whether the cellphone is a hands-free or handheld model.[3,5,6] When people have cellphone conversations, they are required to consider the information they hear very carefully. This concentration on the conversation competes for the brain’s resources in a way that listening to the chatter of a passenger does not and can result in impaired driving performance.[7] Some researchers have suggested that since passengers are in the car, they are aware of the driving conditions and will keep quiet in difficult driving situations.

As well, using a cellphone causes impairment to our peripheral vision, similar to horse blinkers, rendering us blind to objects we would normally have no trouble seeing (for example, a child in a crosswalk). Maples and colleagues measured visual fields on study participants when they were having a cellphone conversation and when they were not. They found greater overall constriction between the visual field isopters plotted during cellphone use compared with no cellphone use.[8] It would appear that our brain recruits neurons for activities that require our attention, such as having a cellphone conversation, although we are not aware this is occurring.

Large numbers of people use cellphones while driving and the numbers continue to increase. The latest studies show that 8% of drivers use a cellphone while driving.[9] Drivers on cell phones will have driving ability similar to a drunk driver and will not be able to see objects in their peripheral vision. And, these drivers will be four times more likely to be in a car crash than drivers not using a cellphone.

Patients listen carefully to advice that is given to them by their physician. Please take a few minutes to tell them how important it is for them to stay off the cellphone while driving.

—Roy Purssell, MD
Chair, Emergency Medical Services


1. McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Bratiman KA. Cell phones and driving: Review of research. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7:89-106.
2. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, et al. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. Br Med J 2005;331:428-431.
3. Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellular telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Engl J Med 1997;336:453-458.
4. Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors 2006;48:381-391.
5. Patten CJD, Kircher A, Ostlund J, et al. Using mobile telephones: Cognitive work­load and attention resource allocation. Accid Anal Prev 2004;36:341-350.
6. Strayer DL, Johnston WA. Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol Sci 2001;12:462-466.
7. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M. The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accid Anal Prev 2007;39:1170-1176.
8. Maples WC, DeRosier W, Hoenes R, et al. The effects of cell phone use on peripheral vision. Optometry 2008;79:36-42.
9. Glassbrenner D. Driver cell phone use in 2004—Overall results. Traffic safety facts: Research note (DOT 809 847) Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.

Roy Purssell, MD, FRCPC. The dangers of driving and talking on the cellphone. BCMJ, Vol. 51, No. 2, March, 2009, Page(s) 58 - Council on Health Promotion.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply